From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Diwaker Gupta Subject: Re: CKRM port Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:16:35 -0700 Sender: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <1b0b45570410131616731cfd1a@mail.gmail.com> References: <1b0b455704101314036e88a2a5@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Diwaker Gupta Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Errors-To: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Steven Hand Cc: xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > Not sure if this is quite what you had in mind tho - this will at least > initially just allow a hosted guest OS to subdivide its resources > amongst processes, without any real additional Xen interaction. Actually I was more interested in letting Xen do a class based resource allocation among the various domains. AFAIK right now this is crudely possible (by using the atropos CPU scheduler, some kind of traffic shaping and/or rate based firewall at the domain0 network interfaces and static disk partitioning (or dynamic using LVM)). However, CKRM will allow a uniform infrastructure to handle all kinds of resources in an integrated fashion. -- Diwaker Gupta http://resolute.ucsd.edu/diwaker ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl