From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Diwaker Gupta Subject: Re: atropos Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 20:10:10 -0800 Message-ID: <1b0b455705022320107214585d@mail.gmail.com> References: <260002866C8EBA4EA0AD853F467EC11E04C2C2@EX2.ad.dcs.gla.ac.uk> Reply-To: Diwaker Gupta Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <260002866C8EBA4EA0AD853F467EC11E04C2C2@EX2.ad.dcs.gla.ac.uk> Sender: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Ross C Mcilroy Cc: xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > I am working on a project which requires enforced CPU partitioning > between domains, and so was planning to use the atropos scheduler. > However I notice from a previous post that atropos does not seem to be > working. Has there been any progress in finding the bug? AFAIK, no. > I also noticed that Stephan Diestelhorst was working on an alternative > deadline-based scheduler. Is this ready for use? I believe it is. I've tried it out and it works pretty well for me. I believe Stephan has a patch that you can use. -- Diwaker Gupta http://resolute.ucsd.edu/diwaker ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click