From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Diwaker Gupta Subject: Re: sedf testing: volunteers please Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:25:24 -0700 Message-ID: <1b0b455705062013254b58dee0@mail.gmail.com> References: <428B3500.3040707@cl.cam.ac.uk> Reply-To: Diwaker Gupta Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <428B3500.3040707@cl.cam.ac.uk> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Stephan Diestelhorst Cc: xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 5/18/05, Stephan Diestelhorst wrote: > The new sedf scheduler has been in the xen-unstable reopository for a > couple of days now. As it may become the default scheduler soon, any > testing now is much appreciated! I'm curious (sorry if this has already been discussed on the list, I couldn't find it in a google search). Note that I'm not defending either BVT or SEDF, I just wanted to know the reasons for the switch from BVT as default :) --=20 Diwaker Gupta http://resolute.ucsd.edu/diwaker