All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@meta.com>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>,
	Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@meta.com>,
	"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: fix lockdep warnings on io_uring encoded reads
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 10:24:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1b224872-bd05-400e-95fd-2c54e3b5fd1d@meta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c919f94-83c4-421c-8ad0-e0c8da305cff@wdc.com>

On 13/11/24 08:21, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> > 
> On 12.11.24 17:01, Mark Harmstone wrote:
>> Lockdep doesn't like the fact that btrfs_uring_read_extent() returns to
>> userspace still holding the inode lock, even though we release it once
>> the I/O finishes. Add calls to rwsem_release() and rwsem_acquire_read() to
>> work round this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
>> Reported-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
>> ---
>>    fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>    1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>> index 1fdeb216bf6c..6ea01e4f940e 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>> @@ -4752,6 +4752,11 @@ static void btrfs_uring_read_finished(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int iss
>>    	size_t page_offset;
>>    	ssize_t ret;
>>    
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
>> +	/* The inode lock has already been acquired in btrfs_uring_read_extent.  */
>> +	rwsem_acquire_read(&inode->vfs_inode.i_rwsem.dep_map, 0, 0, _THIS_IP_);
>> +#endif
>> +
>>    	if (priv->err) {
>>    		ret = priv->err;
>>    		goto out;
>> @@ -4860,6 +4865,15 @@ static int btrfs_uring_read_extent(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
>>    	 * and inode and freeing the allocations.
>>    	 */
>>    
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
>> +	/*
>> +	 * We're returning to userspace with the inode lock held, and that's
>> +	 * okay - it'll get unlocked in a kthread.  Call rwsem_release to
>> +	 * avoid confusing lockdep.
>> +	 */
>> +	rwsem_release(&inode->vfs_inode.i_rwsem.dep_map, _THIS_IP_);
>> +#endif
>> +
>>    	return -EIOCBQUEUED;
>>    
>>    out_fail:
> 
> Can't say anything about the correctness (as I have no clue), but we
> have wrappers around rwsem_release (btrfs_lockdep_release()) and
> rwsem_acquire_read (btrfs_lockdep_acquire()) that I think serve the
> documentation purpose.

btrfs_lockdep_acquire(a,b) calls rwsem_acquire_read on &a->b_map, so 
can't be used for something located at &inode->vfs_inode.i_rwsem.dep_map.

Mark

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-13 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-12 16:00 [PATCH] btrfs: fix lockdep warnings on io_uring encoded reads Mark Harmstone
2024-11-13  8:21 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2024-11-13 10:24   ` Mark Harmstone [this message]
2024-11-13 10:26     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2024-11-14 15:06 ` David Sterba
2024-11-15 15:43   ` Mark Harmstone

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1b224872-bd05-400e-95fd-2c54e3b5fd1d@meta.com \
    --to=maharmstone@meta.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.