All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
To: kan.liang@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, len.brown@intel.com,
	ak@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Rename Denverton and Gemini Lake
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 10:35:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1b7cb461-5321-86cf-3031-5ff545c3dc42@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1533662247-17575-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

On 08/07/2018 10:17 AM, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
> Denverton and Gemini Lake are platform names and should not be used for
> Processor Family stuff. The microarchitecture codename should be used.

Why?

Denverton is the platform.  "Goldmont" is literally the
microarchitecture, and you are suggesting moving *to* the
microarchitecture name, which contradicts the description.

I'm confused.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-07 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-07 17:17 [PATCH] x86/cpu: Rename Denverton and Gemini Lake kan.liang
2018-08-07 17:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-07 17:35 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2018-08-07 17:48   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-07 18:29     ` Dave Hansen
2018-08-07 18:37     ` Andi Kleen
2018-08-07 19:59       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-07 21:10       ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-08-07 22:17         ` Andi Kleen
2018-08-08  5:14           ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-08-08 14:07             ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-09-27 14:25             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-27 14:49               ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-27 14:57                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-27 15:00                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-27 14:53               ` Dave Hansen
2018-09-28 16:07               ` Alan Cox
2018-09-28 19:18                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-07 18:35 ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1b7cb461-5321-86cf-3031-5ff545c3dc42@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.