All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomasz Lichwala <tomasz.lichwala@linux.intel.com>
To: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Cc: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2] ixgbevf: fix link speed reporting for Hyper-V E610 VFs
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 12:45:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1b95d985-0a49-4222-a953-0aab18e414d2@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6fbdcda1-5310-42a2-975d-73ee49e84ee7@molgen.mpg.de>



On 5.08.2026 07:56, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Tomasz,
> 
> 
> Thank you for your patch.
> 
> Am 04.08.26 um 17:39 schrieb Tomasz Lichwala:
>> On Hyper-V E610 VFs the VFLINKS register does not carry valid link speed.
>> Instead, link status is exposed through emulated PCI config space at offset
>> 0x209 in VFLINKS register format. Read and decode it when checking link on
>> E610 VFs.
> 
> Is that emulated space documented somewhere? It’d be great if you added a reference.
> 

The emulated PCI config space layout is defined by the Hyper-V NetVSC synthetic NIC interface. I've expanded the commit message to mention the Hyper-V synthetic NIC and added before/after ethtool output.

> Also, it’d be great if you documented the commands and output without and with your patch in the commit message, and mention the Hyper-V environment.
> 

Expanded the commit message to describe the problem — VFLINKS does not reflect the actual negotiated speed on E610 VFs under Hyper-V, and how the fix reads link status from emulated PCI config space instead. I did not include specific ethtool output because the reported speed varies depending on  the NIC and link configuration.

>> Fixes: 4c44b450c69b ("ixgbevf: Add support for Intel(R) E610 device")
>> Reviewed-by: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Lichwala <tomasz.lichwala@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/vf.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>   1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/vf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/vf.c
>> index f6df86d124b9..4c460ec62de3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/vf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/vf.c
>> @@ -1,14 +1,17 @@
>>   // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>   /* Copyright(c) 1999 - 2024 Intel Corporation. */
>>   +#include <linux/unaligned.h>
>> +
>>   #include "vf.h"
>>   #include "ixgbevf.h"
>>   -/* On Hyper-V, to reset, we need to read from this offset
>> - * from the PCI config space. This is the mechanism used on
>> - * Hyper-V to support PF/VF communication.
>> +/* On Hyper-V the PF/VF communication is through emulated PCI config
>> + * space. The reset and link status are exposed at the offsets below.
>>    */
>> -#define IXGBE_HV_RESET_OFFSET           0x201
>> +#define IXGBE_HV_RESET_OFFSET        0x201
>> +#define IXGBE_HV_LINK_STATUS_OFFSET    0x209
>> +#define IXGBE_HV_LINK_STATUS_SIZE    4
>>     static inline s32 ixgbevf_write_msg_read_ack(struct ixgbe_hw *hw, u32 *msg,
>>                            u32 *retmsg, u16 size)
>> @@ -901,6 +904,40 @@ static s32 ixgbevf_check_mac_link_vf(struct ixgbe_hw *hw,
>>       return ret_val;
>>   }
>>   +/**
>> + * ixgbevf_hv_read_links_e610 - read link status from PCI config space
>> + * @hw: pointer to hardware structure
>> + * @links_reg: pointer to store read value
>> + *
>> + * On Hyper-V E610 VFs the VFLINKS register does not carry valid link speed.
>> + * Instead, link status is exposed through emulated PCI config space at offset
>> + * 0x209 in VFLINKS register format.
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on failure.
>> + */
>> +static s32 ixgbevf_hv_read_links_e610(struct ixgbe_hw *hw, u32 *links_reg)
>> +{
>> +    struct ixgbevf_adapter *adapter = hw->back;
>> +
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG)
> 
> Can the check be done in C code, and the linker will remove the unused stuff? This way everything would be seen by the compiler and compile checked.
> 

Good point. Dropped the #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG) guard entirely. Offset 0x209 is in extended PCI config space, so pci_read_config_byte() will return a PCIBIOS error if ECAM is not available, and the caller already handles read failures by reporting link down. This way the compiler always sees the full code path.

>> +    u8 data[IXGBE_HV_LINK_STATUS_SIZE];
>> +
>> +    for (int i = 0; i < IXGBE_HV_LINK_STATUS_SIZE; i++) {
>> +        int ret = pci_read_config_byte(adapter->pdev,
>> +                           IXGBE_HV_LINK_STATUS_OFFSET + i,
>> +                           &data[i]);
>> +        if (ret)
>> +            return pcibios_err_to_errno(ret);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    *links_reg = get_unaligned_le32(data);
>> +    return 0;
>> +#else
>> +    dev_err_once(&adapter->pdev->dev, "cannot read link status, PCI_MMCONFIG is required for Hyper-V\n");
>> +    return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +#endif
>> +}
>> +
>>   /**
>>    * ixgbevf_hv_check_mac_link_vf - check link
>>    * @hw: pointer to private hardware struct
>> @@ -909,6 +946,7 @@ static s32 ixgbevf_check_mac_link_vf(struct ixgbe_hw *hw,
>>    * @autoneg_wait_to_complete: unused
>>    *
>>    * Hyper-V variant; there is no mailbox communication.
>> + * For E610 VFs, link status is read from emulated PCI config space.
>>    */
>>   static s32 ixgbevf_hv_check_mac_link_vf(struct ixgbe_hw *hw,
>>                       ixgbe_link_speed *speed,
>> @@ -923,13 +961,30 @@ static s32 ixgbevf_hv_check_mac_link_vf(struct ixgbe_hw *hw,
>>       if (!mbx->ops.check_for_rst(hw) || !mbx->timeout)
>>           mac->get_link_status = true;
>>   +    /* E610 VFs always read link status from emulated PCI config space
>> +     * because VFLINKS does not carry valid speed for these devices.
>> +     * Skip get_link_status caching since PCI config reads are cheap.
>> +     */
>> +    if (mac->type == ixgbe_mac_e610_vf) {
>> +        if (ixgbevf_hv_read_links_e610(hw, &links_reg)) {
>> +            *link_up = false;
>> +            *speed = IXGBE_LINK_SPEED_UNKNOWN;
>> +            return 0;
>> +        }
>> +        goto decode;
>> +    }
>> +
>>       if (!mac->get_link_status)
>>           goto out;
>>   -    /* if link status is down no point in checking to see if pf is up */
>>       links_reg = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_VFLINKS);
>> -    if (!(links_reg & IXGBE_LINKS_UP))
>> -        goto out;
>> +
>> +decode:
> 
> How would the implementation without goto look like?
> 

Replaced goto decode with an if/else structure - the E610 path and the VFLINKS register read are now in separate branches, falling through to the common link-down / speed decode logic below.

>> +    if (!(links_reg & IXGBE_LINKS_UP)) {
>> +        *link_up = false;
>> +        *speed = IXGBE_LINK_SPEED_UNKNOWN;
>> +        return 0;
>> +    }
>>         /* for SFP+ modules and DA cables on 82599 it can take up to 500usecs
>>        * before the link status is correct
>> @@ -941,8 +996,11 @@ static s32 ixgbevf_hv_check_mac_link_vf(struct ixgbe_hw *hw,
>>               udelay(100);
>>               links_reg = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_VFLINKS);
>>   -            if (!(links_reg & IXGBE_LINKS_UP))
>> -                goto out;
>> +            if (!(links_reg & IXGBE_LINKS_UP)) {
>> +                *link_up = false;
>> +                *speed = IXGBE_LINK_SPEED_UNKNOWN;
>> +                return 0;
>> +            }
>>           }
>>       }
>>   @@ -956,6 +1014,9 @@ static s32 ixgbevf_hv_check_mac_link_vf(struct ixgbe_hw *hw,
>>       case IXGBE_LINKS_SPEED_100_82599:
>>           *speed = IXGBE_LINK_SPEED_100_FULL;
>>           break;
>> +    default:
>> +        *speed = IXGBE_LINK_SPEED_UNKNOWN;
>> +        break;
>>       }
>>         /* if we passed all the tests above then the link is up and we no
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Paul


Kind regards,

Tomasz


      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-06 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-04 15:39 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2] ixgbevf: fix link speed reporting for Hyper-V E610 VFs Tomasz Lichwala
2026-08-05  5:56 ` Paul Menzel
2026-08-06 10:45   ` Tomasz Lichwala [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1b95d985-0a49-4222-a953-0aab18e414d2@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tomasz.lichwala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=marcin.szycik@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.