From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915: change force wake order for
	GT read
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:46:20 +0000
Message-ID: <1bdc18$jud1l6@fmsmga002.fm.intel.com>
References: <1300699639-23996-1-git-send-email-zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
	<1300699639-23996-7-git-send-email-zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967FD9E78F
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Mon, 21 Mar 2011 02:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1300699639-23996-7-git-send-email-zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:27:17 +0800, Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Move FORCEWAKE_ACK == 0 wait after setting force wake to 0. This is
> another way to set force wake for GT read from spec. And also this
> makes RC6 setting order strictly follow spec.

The spec does indeed give both methods. So do you have any reason to
change to the slower variant?
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre