All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: "Peter Wang (王信友)" <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
	"beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
	"sh043.lee@samsung.com" <sh043.lee@samsung.com>,
	"avri.altman@wdc.com" <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
	"storage.sec@samsung.com" <storage.sec@samsung.com>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"alim.akhtar@samsung.com" <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	"adrian.hunter@intel.com" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UFS: Make TM command timeout configurable from host side
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 08:51:13 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1bf9f247-8cd7-400e-a5c8-6f3936927dfc@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8d239f26e1011eee49b7c678ba07fd4d9ca81d24.camel@mediatek.com>


On 11/11/25 6:58 PM, Peter Wang (王信友) wrote:
> Using a module parameter is a flexible method if the customer
> is using a device that may require an extended timeout value.

Introducing a new kernel module parameter for a timeout that depends on
the UFS device model doesn't sound ideal to me.

Can't we increase the default timeout (TM_CMD_TIMEOUT)? Increasing the 
default timeout shouldn't affect any configuration negatively, isn't it?

Thanks,

Bart.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-12 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20251106012702epcas1p28fdeed020ea44f18dcc751c283fbbcc2@epcas1p2.samsung.com>
2025-11-06  1:26 ` [PATCH] UFS: Make TM command timeout configurable from host side Seunghui Lee
2025-11-11  2:46   ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-11  8:44     ` Seunghui Lee
2025-11-11  9:03       ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-11 16:37         ` Bart Van Assche
2025-11-12  2:58           ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-12  8:49             ` Seunghui Lee
2025-11-12  9:42               ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-12 16:51             ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2025-11-13 10:08               ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-17  7:11                 ` Seunghui Lee
2025-11-17  8:40                   ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-17  9:48                     ` Seunghui Lee
2025-11-18  5:48                       ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-17 16:43                   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-11-18  5:55                     ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-18 17:31                       ` Bart Van Assche
2025-11-19  9:20                         ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-17 16:40                 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-11-18  5:52                   ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-11 16:38   ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1bf9f247-8cd7-400e-a5c8-6f3936927dfc@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=sh043.lee@samsung.com \
    --cc=storage.sec@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.