From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>, Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>
Subject: [PATCH] core-parking: fix build with gcc12 and NR_CPUS=1
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 12:18:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1c23930f-e809-d623-18ec-599a0e983b7a@suse.com> (raw)
Gcc12 takes issue with core_parking_remove()'s
for ( ; i < cur_idle_nums; ++i )
core_parking_cpunum[i] = core_parking_cpunum[i + 1];
complaining that the right hand side array access is past the bounds of
1. Clearly the compiler can't know that cur_idle_nums can only ever be
zero in this case (as the sole CPU cannot be parked).
Beyond addressing the immediate issue also adjust core_parking_init():
There's no point registering any policy when there's no CPU to park.
Since this still doesn't result in the compiler spotting that
core_parking_policy is never written (and hence is continuously NULL),
also amend core_parking_helper() to avoid eventual similar issues there
(minimizing generated code at the same time).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
--- a/xen/common/core_parking.c
+++ b/xen/common/core_parking.c
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ long cf_check core_parking_helper(void *
unsigned int cpu;
int ret = 0;
- if ( !core_parking_policy )
+ if ( !core_parking_policy || CONFIG_NR_CPUS == 1 )
return -EINVAL;
while ( cur_idle_nums < idle_nums )
@@ -213,8 +213,9 @@ long cf_check core_parking_helper(void *
bool core_parking_remove(unsigned int cpu)
{
- unsigned int i;
bool found = false;
+#if CONFIG_NR_CPUS > 1
+ unsigned int i;
spin_lock(&accounting_lock);
@@ -230,6 +231,7 @@ bool core_parking_remove(unsigned int cp
core_parking_cpunum[i] = core_parking_cpunum[i + 1];
spin_unlock(&accounting_lock);
+#endif /* CONFIG_NR_CPUS > 1 */
return found;
}
@@ -260,9 +262,11 @@ static int __init register_core_parking_
static int __init cf_check core_parking_init(void)
{
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret;
- if ( core_parking_controller == PERFORMANCE_FIRST )
+ if ( CONFIG_NR_CPUS == 1 )
+ ret = 0;
+ else if ( core_parking_controller == PERFORMANCE_FIRST )
ret = register_core_parking_policy(&performance_first);
else
ret = register_core_parking_policy(&power_first);
next reply other threads:[~2022-09-09 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-09 10:18 Jan Beulich [this message]
2022-09-09 11:00 ` [PATCH] core-parking: fix build with gcc12 and NR_CPUS=1 Julien Grall
2022-09-09 12:14 ` Jan Beulich
2022-09-09 12:27 ` Julien Grall
2022-09-09 14:21 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1c23930f-e809-d623-18ec-599a0e983b7a@suse.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=julien@xen.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.