From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EF0C3D60 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 17:33:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1651080820; x=1682616820; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=wjMvRhiHABnAGynZ3KIK5c7aUG/RoRC3XO/EBj3XQRI=; b=DDygjC9VfgFrM8AhCeSC1/DBRht0SmI9bHfxtbl8ETlB8aiKXnyOongV 7ISsj9Hvuq4N5u06/BKTEFq4+VeHgFy0T9qzvF1TC/IIjOID8KCg1Hgel Aaz2Sb0X11KIyNAOF4/c2aD1XRErU+oK06mTJI1qV+suRau7EFqPCBtX/ 0vDMNS7MJsYC7aceN8lek74ts7W8/Kr2TiXMOey7T+w0SJod9q32tUHD0 1AS+zvgpEAaf7rfXVCqDw3/p+3MZrOCvaPVluz9hEZNIQjW0yFg3bZa1k 9xwMFy9HcriyWm9pLW+rpmRG1yMuYMSFgx452Xuoe3S4oQY+XUtBUD3hx Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10330"; a="328955196" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,293,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="328955196" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Apr 2022 10:33:39 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,293,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="580725917" Received: from ddavid-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.209.54.244]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Apr 2022 10:33:28 -0700 Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 10:33:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Mat Martineau To: Matthieu Baerts cc: Geliang Tang , mptcp@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-next] Squash to "selftests: bpf: add MPTCP test base" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <1c8d39c9-647b-44a-b4fa-729a2b4decf@linux.intel.com> References: <38168fb95c78454db24726d2bd45f2d65d977fda.1651022882.git.geliang.tang@suse.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: mptcp@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII On Wed, 27 Apr 2022, Matthieu Baerts wrote: > Hi Geliang, > > Thank you for the patch! > > On 27/04/2022 03:28, Geliang Tang wrote: >> Add CONFIG_IKCONFIG and CONFIG_IKCONFIG_PROC as Mat suggested. > > Mat's second reply on... > > Squash to "selftests: bpf: test bpf_skc_to_mptcp_sock" > > ...patch confuses me but I think he meant: we need this patch as it is > and that's why it is marked as Queued on Patchwork. But for this fix > here, it is probably best to have a dedicated patch and not a Squash-to > one because these two config should have been added before as they are > needed by other BPF selftests. > > Did I misunderstand? > You understood correctly, Mattheiu. If I send a v2 of the bpf-next patches today I will add the commit and also queue it in our patchwork. -- Mat Martineau Intel