From: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@intel.com>,
"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>,
"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"kas@kernel.org" <kas@kernel.org>,
"Li, Xiaoyao" <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
"Maloor, Kishen" <kishen.maloor@intel.com>,
"dedekind1@gmail.com" <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
"tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com" <tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"nik.borisov@suse.com" <nik.borisov@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] KVM: TDX: Report CORE_CAPABILITIES as configurable
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 08:03:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1cc1a933-59e6-4e56-9b3d-3d556c8883dd@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c5543092453fd1509695e2e17024fe20e45ee9a.camel@intel.com>
On 9/23/2026 5:11 AM, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> On Thu, 2026-09-17 at 15:25 +0800, Binbin Wu wrote:
>> Add CORE_CAPABILITIES (CPUID.0x7.0.EDX[30]) to KVM's allowlist of TDX
>> directly configurable CPUID feature bits, even though KVM doesn't support
>> MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS for TDX guests, to accommodate the legacy TDX module
>> definition and userspace's stale knowledge of it.
>>
>> Older TDX specifications define the CORE_CAPABILITIES CPUID bit as
>> fixed-1, so userspace may expect the bit to be enabled for TDs. #VE
>> reduction turns it into a directly configurable bit, so leaving it out of
>> the allowlist would make the bit impossible to enable once KVM starts
>> validating userspace's CPUID input, i.e. would be a surprising behavior
>> change for such userspace.
>
> Since #VE reduction is controlled from the guest side, this is a bit confusing.
> Turning on #VE reduction can't change CORE_CAPABILITIES configurability status
> because it's too late. You mean that this was changed from fixed-1 to
> configurable to support #VE reduction arch? (I'm not sure why though).
Yes, a fixed-1 bit was changed to directly configurable bit if it is a
#VE reduction bit, regardless the guest enables #VE reduction or not.
I.e. CORE_CAPABILITIES was fixed-1 bit, but now it's directly configurable
by the definition of the specs.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 7:25 [PATCH v4 0/4] KVM: TDX: Validate directly configurable CPUID bits Binbin Wu
2026-09-17 7:25 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] KVM: TDX: Track configurable CPUID bits allowed by KVM Binbin Wu
2026-09-23 0:01 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-09-23 0:14 ` Binbin Wu
2026-09-23 0:45 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-09-23 0:57 ` Binbin Wu
2026-09-23 1:09 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-09-23 1:17 ` Binbin Wu
2026-09-23 11:21 ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-09-23 14:25 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-09-24 2:05 ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-09-24 6:36 ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-09-24 7:49 ` Binbin Wu
2026-09-24 9:30 ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-09-24 11:41 ` Binbin Wu
2026-09-24 13:55 ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-09-24 15:10 ` Binbin Wu
2026-09-24 14:33 ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-09-28 8:08 ` Binbin Wu
2026-09-28 23:58 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-09-29 0:19 ` Binbin Wu
2026-09-17 7:25 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] KVM: TDX: Report CORE_CAPABILITIES as configurable Binbin Wu
2026-09-22 21:11 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-09-23 0:03 ` Binbin Wu [this message]
2026-09-24 6:44 ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-09-17 7:25 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] KVM: TDX: Filter configurable CPUID bits Binbin Wu
2026-09-23 0:16 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-09-23 0:28 ` Binbin Wu
2026-09-23 0:34 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-09-17 7:25 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] KVM: TDX: Validate userspace CPUID input for KVM_TDX_INIT_VM Binbin Wu
2026-09-23 0:16 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1cc1a933-59e6-4e56-9b3d-3d556c8883dd@linux.intel.com \
--to=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kishen.maloor@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.