From: "Belgaumkar, Vinay" <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
To: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"Alexander Shishkin" <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf: Add checks to prevent null ptr access
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 14:48:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d6c8cd5-76e9-421c-9e36-3de7c2816d27@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f2b62bcb-b5a1-48e9-93c8-644ab3ac4439@linux.intel.com>
On 9/15/2026 6:40 PM, Mi, Dapeng wrote:
> On 9/5/2026 2:16 AM, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>> Sashiko recommended some additional checks to prevent null pointer
>> access. Check for revoked states inside perf_event_read_local(), as
>> the pmu event may have already been freed at this point. Add a null
> Could you please show where perf_event_read_local() could be called after
> the event is revoked?
perf_event_read_local() is only available to be called in the kernel
context. So, BPF helpers can call it. This was the scenario outlined by
Sashiko:
If CPU A calls perf_event_read_local(), disables interrupts, and locklessly
checks event->state, it can pass if the event state is
PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE.
Concurrently, if CPU B calls perf_pmu_unregister() which leads to
__pmu_detach_event(), it will not send an IPI to synchronize with CPU A
since the event is inactive. CPU B then sets event->state to
PERF_EVENT_STATE_REVOKED and clears event->pmu to NULL.
When CPU A continues and calls __perf_event_read_cpu(event, event->cpu),
if the event has PERF_EV_CAP_READ_SCOPE, it will dereference
event->pmu->scope, which was just set to NULL by CPU B, causing a panic.
So, I think the scenario is- we have a regular perf session ongoing and
a parallel session (through BPF) that tries to access the same counter.
>
> BTW, the prefix should be "perf/core:" instead of "perf:" by following
> current naming convention.
Sure.
Thanks,
Vinay.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>> check inside __perf_event_read_cpu() as well before accessing the pmu
>> ptr.
>>
>> Cc: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/events/core.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
>> index 7777e82aad5e..059f82f0cadd 100644
>> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
>> @@ -4788,14 +4788,19 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *perf_scope_cpu_topology_cpumask(unsigned int
>>
>> static int __perf_event_read_cpu(struct perf_event *event, int event_cpu)
>> {
>> + struct pmu *pmu = READ_ONCE(event->pmu);
>> int local_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>> u16 local_pkg, event_pkg;
>>
>> if ((unsigned)event_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
>> return event_cpu;
>>
>> + if (!pmu)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> if (event->group_caps & PERF_EV_CAP_READ_SCOPE) {
>> - const struct cpumask *cpumask = perf_scope_cpu_topology_cpumask(event->pmu->scope, event_cpu);
>> + const struct cpumask *cpumask = perf_scope_cpu_topology_cpumask(pmu->scope,
>> + event_cpu);
>>
>> if (cpumask && cpumask_test_cpu(local_cpu, cpumask))
>> return local_cpu;
>> @@ -4917,6 +4922,11 @@ int perf_event_read_local(struct perf_event *event, u64 *value,
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> + if (READ_ONCE(event->state) <= PERF_EVENT_STATE_REVOKED) {
>> + ret = -ENODEV;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> /*
>> * Get the event CPU numbers, and adjust them to local if the event is
>> * a per-package event that can be read locally
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-04 18:16 [PATCH 1/2] perf: Fix null pointer access in is_include_guest_event() Vinay Belgaumkar
2026-09-04 18:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf: Add checks to prevent null ptr access Vinay Belgaumkar
2026-09-04 18:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 1:40 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-09-16 21:48 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay [this message]
2026-09-17 1:03 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-09-17 8:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-17 20:10 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2026-09-18 9:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-04 18:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf: Fix null pointer access in is_include_guest_event() sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 6:24 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-09-18 1:07 ` Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1d6c8cd5-76e9-421c-9e36-3de7c2816d27@intel.com \
--to=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.