From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 152E6EB64D7 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 13:19:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.552758.863038 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qBxjX-0006H7-Ff; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 13:18:51 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 552758.863038; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 13:18:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qBxjX-0006G9-9Y; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 13:18:51 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 552758; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 13:18:50 +0000 Received: from se1-gles-flk1-in.inumbo.com ([94.247.172.50] helo=se1-gles-flk1.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qBxjW-0005TW-4T for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 13:18:50 +0000 Received: from support.bugseng.com (mail.bugseng.com [162.55.131.47]) by se1-gles-flk1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 281f8ab4-1036-11ee-8611-37d641c3527e; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 15:18:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.143] (unknown [151.44.212.241]) by support.bugseng.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AEEA94EE0737; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 15:18:46 +0200 (CEST) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 281f8ab4-1036-11ee-8611-37d641c3527e Message-ID: <1e348612-16ff-1446-72fa-9a350d3e99ca@bugseng.com> Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 15:18:43 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050929 Thunderbird/1.0.7 Fedora/1.0.7-1.1.fc4 Mnenhy/0.7.3.0 Subject: Re: [XEN PATCH v2] docs/misra: document the C dialect and translation toolchain assumptions. Content-Language: en-US To: Jan Beulich Cc: roger.pau@citrix.com, bertrand.marquis@arm.com, michal.orzel@amd.com, xenia.ragiadakou@amd.com, ayan.kumar.halder@amd.com, consulting@bugseng.com, Andrew Cooper , George Dunlap , Julien Grall , Stefano Stabellini , Wei Liu , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org References: <4a06234a-d9ee-4359-3260-eaf18dc83f86@suse.com> From: Roberto Bagnara In-Reply-To: <4a06234a-d9ee-4359-3260-eaf18dc83f86@suse.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 20/06/23 16:56, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 20.06.2023 14:10, Roberto Bagnara wrote: >> + * - Arithmetic operator on void type >> + - ARM64, X86_64 >> + - See Section "6.24 Arithmetic on void- and Function-Pointers" of GCC_MANUAL." > > The first line is misleading - we don't (and can't) do arithmetic on void. > What we do is arithmetic on pointers to void (like the gcc section title > properly says). You are right: corrected now. Thanks, Roberto