All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fawad Lateef <fawadlateef@gmail.com>
To: Nick Warne <nick@linicks.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A pettiness question.
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:43:26 +0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e62d1370509211943443ba3ea@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200509212046.15793.nick@linicks.net>

On 9/22/05, Nick Warne <nick@linicks.net> wrote:
>
> Interesting.  I thought maybe this way was trick, until later I experimented.
>
> My post here (as Bill Stokes):
>
> http://www.quakesrc.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5626
>
> So what is the reason to doing !!num as opposed to num ? 1:0 (which is more
> readable I think, especially to a lesser experienced C coder).  Quicker to
> type?
>

I think using !! is quick and the place where it is used, will look
little bit odd (like you say in #define or macros) if some one use num
? 1 : 0 ...... And I think lesser experienced C coder will learn other
ways of doing same things !!!!!

> My quick test shows compiler renders both the same?
>

Ya, I think both !! and num ? 1: 0 will result in same thing by compiler

--
Fawad Lateef

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-09-22  2:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-21 19:46 A pettiness question Nick Warne
2005-09-21 20:05 ` Vadim Lobanov
2005-09-22  7:10   ` Helge Hafting
2005-09-22 12:21     ` Steven Rostedt
2005-09-22 14:40       ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-09-22  2:43 ` Fawad Lateef [this message]
     [not found] <4PiLw-2yn-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <4Pj4M-3as-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <4PtnM-1oW-55@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <4Pynh-fp-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-09-25 14:38       ` Bodo Eggert
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-21  7:49 liyu
2005-09-21  8:00 ` Ustyugov Roman
2005-09-21  8:57   ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2005-09-21  9:01   ` Fawad Lateef
2005-09-21  9:30     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-09-23  2:36       ` Vadim Lobanov
2005-09-21 15:08   ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-09-21 19:11 ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1e62d1370509211943443ba3ea@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=fawadlateef@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nick@linicks.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.