From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, kernel-team@fb.com,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, void@manifault.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
ast@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 7/8] libbpf: sync progs autoload with maps autocreate for struct_ops maps
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 18:10:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e95162a-a8d7-44e6-bc63-999df8cae987@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240227204556.17524-8-eddyz87@gmail.com>
On 2/27/24 12:45 PM, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> Make bpf_map__set_autocreate() for struct_ops maps toggle autoload
> state for referenced programs.
>
> E.g. for the BPF code below:
>
> SEC("struct_ops/test_1") int BPF_PROG(foo) { ... }
> SEC("struct_ops/test_2") int BPF_PROG(bar) { ... }
>
> SEC(".struct_ops.link")
> struct test_ops___v1 A = {
> .foo = (void *)foo
> };
>
> SEC(".struct_ops.link")
> struct test_ops___v2 B = {
> .foo = (void *)foo,
> .bar = (void *)bar,
> };
>
> And the following libbpf API calls:
>
> bpf_map__set_autocreate(skel->maps.A, true);
> bpf_map__set_autocreate(skel->maps.B, false);
>
> The autoload would be enabled for program 'foo' and disabled for
> program 'bar'.
>
> Do not apply such toggling if program autoload state is set by a call
> to bpf_program__set_autoload().
>
> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index b39d3f2898a1..1ea3046724f8 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -446,13 +446,18 @@ struct bpf_program {
> struct bpf_object *obj;
>
> int fd;
> - bool autoload;
> + bool autoload:1;
> + bool autoload_user_set:1;
> bool autoattach;
> bool sym_global;
> bool mark_btf_static;
> enum bpf_prog_type type;
> enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
> int exception_cb_idx;
> + /* total number of struct_ops maps with autocreate == true
> + * that reference this program
> + */
> + __u32 struct_ops_refs;
Instead of adding struct_ops_refs and autoload_user_set,
for BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS, how about deciding to load it or not by checking
prog->attach_btf_id (non zero) alone. The prog->attach_btf_id is now decided at
load time and is only set if it is used by at least one autocreate map, if I
read patch 2 & 3 correctly.
Meaning ignore prog->autoload*. Load the struct_ops prog as long as it is used
by one struct_ops map with autocreate == true.
If the struct_ops prog is not used in any struct_ops map, the bpf prog cannot be
loaded even the autoload is set. If bpf prog is used in a struct_ops map and its
autoload is set to false, the struct_ops map will be in broken state. Thus,
prog->autoload does not fit very well with struct_ops prog and may as well
depend on whether the struct_ops prog is used by a struct_ops map alone?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-28 2:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-27 20:45 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/8] libbpf: type suffixes and autocreate flag for struct_ops maps Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/8] libbpf: allow version suffixes (___smth) for struct_ops types Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 21:47 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-27 21:49 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 16:29 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 17:28 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 17:30 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 23:21 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-28 23:37 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/8] libbpf: tie struct_ops programs to kernel BTF ids, not to local ids Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 7:41 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-28 17:23 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 17:40 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 17:50 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 23:28 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-28 23:31 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 23:34 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/8] libbpf: honor autocreate flag for struct_ops maps Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 17:44 ` David Vernet
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/8] selftests/bpf: test struct_ops map definition with type suffix Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 18:03 ` David Vernet
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/8] selftests/bpf: bad_struct_ops test Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 18:15 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 20:06 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 20:11 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 23:40 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-28 23:44 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 23:56 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-29 0:06 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 6/8] selftests/bpf: test autocreate behavior for struct_ops maps Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 18:29 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 18:34 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 19:31 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 23:43 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-28 23:55 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-29 0:02 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-29 0:56 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-03-01 1:28 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-01 18:03 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-01 18:07 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 7/8] libbpf: sync progs autoload with maps autocreate " Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 22:55 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-27 23:09 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 23:16 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-27 23:30 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 23:40 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-27 23:43 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 0:12 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-28 0:50 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 2:10 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2024-02-28 12:36 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 23:55 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-29 0:04 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-29 0:14 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-29 0:25 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-29 0:30 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-29 0:37 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-29 0:40 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-27 20:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 8/8] selftests/bpf: tests for struct_ops autoload/autocreate toggling Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-28 18:36 ` David Vernet
2024-02-28 20:10 ` Eduard Zingerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1e95162a-a8d7-44e6-bc63-999df8cae987@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.