From: Andrew Shugg <andrew@neep.com.au>
To: parisc-linux@thepuffingroup.com
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server?
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 07:48:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000301074847.A13653@neep.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20000229122439.F9944@thepuffingroup.com>; from willy@thepuffingroup.com on Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 12:24:39PM -0500
First of all, thanks to two Robs (Womack and Hoppe), Willy and Grant for
their feedback. With any luck I'll be able to talk 'em into a cheap deal -
especially seeing as it's costing them a fair whack per month for floor space
rental in a data centre, even though it's switched off ...
Willy also said:
> 300 series... aarrrgghh :-) 300/400 series machines are m68k based.
> We are sharing their HIL keyboard driver (share in the sense of `copied
> and made changes but will merge back later' sense), and Steve Shack
> mentioned something about the 300-series STI interface recently.
I'm a bit confused by this. I thought the HP 375 was a PA-RISC thingy.
Certainly there have been numerous people on this list talking about getting
their 315's or whatever to boot the parisc-linux kernel.
Had me a look at the HW database, and it says the 375 carries a 'PA7000'
processor. (As a side note, the link for this in the database,
"http://216.208.98.4/view.php3?type=cpu&name=PA7000 (PCX-S)", made my proxy
server unhappy. Dropping the " (PCX-S)" off the end of it helped.)
Is a PA7000 not a PA-RISC chip?
Showing my ignorance,
Andrew.
--
Andrew Shugg <andrew@neep.com.au> http://www.neep.com.au/
"Just remember Basil, there's always someone worse off than yourself."
"Oh, really? I'd like to meet him ... I could do with a good laugh."
[ Sybil and Basil Fawlty, "Fawlty Towers" ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-03-01 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-02-29 17:06 [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? Andrew Shugg
2000-02-29 14:57 ` Robert Womack
2000-02-29 17:24 ` willy
2000-02-29 23:20 ` Grant Grundler
2000-02-29 23:48 ` Andrew Shugg [this message]
2000-02-29 21:03 ` Robert Womack
2000-03-01 0:17 ` willy
2000-03-02 13:02 ` Andrew Shugg
2000-03-02 17:08 ` willy
2000-03-02 18:15 ` Stan Sieler
2000-03-01 4:35 ` Sandy Harris
[not found] ` <38BCA09A.9ABADBD0@cln.etc.bc.ca>
2000-03-05 23:01 ` Sandy Harris
2000-03-05 23:24 ` Barrie Spence
2000-03-06 2:22 ` [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server T. Martin
2000-03-06 11:47 ` Frank Benke
2000-03-07 0:00 ` Barrie Spence
2000-02-29 18:06 ` [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? rob hoppe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-02-29 23:55 Mike Hibler
2000-03-02 17:01 Mike Hibler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20000301074847.A13653@neep.com.au \
--to=andrew@neep.com.au \
--cc=parisc-linux@thepuffingroup.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.