All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kanoj@google.engr.sgi.com (Kanoj Sarcar)
To: riel@nl.linux.org
Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu,
	torvalds@transmeta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: kswapd
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 17:21:11 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200003270121.RAA88890@google.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0003262143500.1104-100000@duckman.conectiva> from "Rik van Riel" at Mar 26, 2000 09:59:23 PM

> 
> On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Russell King wrote:
> 
> > I think I've solved (very dirtily) my kswapd problem
> 
> Your patch is the correct one. I've added an extra reschedule
> point and cleaned up the code a little bit. I wonder who sent
> the brown-paper-bag patch with the superfluous while loop to
> Linus ...        (please raise your hand and/or buy rmk a beer)

That would be me ...

What is the problem that your patch is fixing? Other than the 
while loop cosmetic changes, the only thing I see is to do 
with rescheduling (ie, do not invoke do_try_to_free_pages or
run_task_queue() if need_resched is set). Note that before this 
patch went in, as in 2.3.43 for example, the loop used to be:

                do {
                        /* kswapd is critical to provide GFP_ATOMIC
                           allocations (not GFP_HIGHMEM ones). */
                        if (nr_free_pages() - nr_free_highpages() >= freepages.high)
                                break;
                        if (!do_try_to_free_pages(GFP_KSWAPD, 0))
                                break;
                        run_task_queue(&tq_disk);
                } while (!tsk->need_resched);
                tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
                interruptible_sleep_on(&kswapd_wait);
        }

Which is the behavior I _tried_ to preserve. Oh, btw, I am not convinced
that you should do a run_task_queue after _all_ pgdats have been scanned,
rather than after each one.

Kanoj

> 
> Linus, could you please apply this patch ASAP? :)
> 
> regards,
> 
> Rik  (PS. I'm still planning to implement the VM changes I posted
> to linux-mm earlier today, kswapd could be better and more efficient)
> --
> The Internet is not a network of computers. It is a network
> of people. That is its real strength.
> 
> Wanna talk about the kernel?  irc.openprojects.net / #kernelnewbies
> http://www.conectiva.com/		http://www.surriel.com/
> 
> 
> 
> --- linux-2.3.99-pre3/mm/vmscan.c.orig	Sat Mar 25 12:57:20 2000
> +++ linux-2.3.99-pre3/mm/vmscan.c	Sun Mar 26 21:37:19 2000
> @@ -499,19 +499,19 @@
>  		 * the processes needing more memory will wake us
>  		 * up on a more timely basis.
>  		 */
> -		do {
> -			pgdat = pgdat_list;
> -			while (pgdat) {
> -				for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_ZONES; i++) {
> -					zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
> -					if ((!zone->size) || (!zone->zone_wake_kswapd))
> -						continue;
> -					do_try_to_free_pages(GFP_KSWAPD, zone);
> -				}
> -				pgdat = pgdat->node_next;
> +		pgdat = pgdat_list;
> +		while (pgdat) {
> +			for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_ZONES; i++) {
> +				zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
> +				if (tsk->need_resched)
> +					schedule();
> +				if ((!zone->size) || (!zone->zone_wake_kswapd))
> +					continue;
> +				do_try_to_free_pages(GFP_KSWAPD, zone);
>  			}
> -			run_task_queue(&tq_disk);
> -		} while (!tsk->need_resched);
> +			pgdat = pgdat->node_next;
> +		}
> +		run_task_queue(&tq_disk);
>  		tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
>  		interruptible_sleep_on(&kswapd_wait);
>  	}
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

  reply	other threads:[~2000-03-27  1:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200003261008.LAA16031@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk>
2000-03-27  0:59 ` [PATCH] Re: kswapd Rik van Riel
2000-03-27  1:21   ` Kanoj Sarcar [this message]
2000-03-27  2:28     ` Rik van Riel
2000-03-27  2:39       ` Kanoj Sarcar
2000-03-27  6:42         ` Russell King
2000-03-27  6:02     ` Eric W. Biederman
2000-03-27  6:07     ` Linus Torvalds
2000-03-27  8:00       ` Kanoj Sarcar
2000-03-27 14:47         ` Rik van Riel
2000-03-27 16:14         ` Linus Torvalds
2000-03-27 16:54           ` Mark Hahn
2000-03-27 17:36             ` Linus Torvalds
2000-03-27 17:54             ` Rik van Riel
2000-03-27 18:55           ` Kanoj Sarcar
2000-03-27 18:34         ` Russell King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200003270121.RAA88890@google.engr.sgi.com \
    --to=kanoj@google.engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@nl.linux.org \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.