From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailserv2.iuinc.com (IDENT:qmailr@mailserv2.iuinc.com [206.245.164.55]) by puffin.external.hp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA07912 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:33:24 -0700 From: willy@thepuffingroup.com Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:52:20 -0500 To: Corne Beerse Cc: parisc-linux@thepuffingroup.com Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Couple of questions Message-ID: <20000329135220.B5424@thepuffingroup.com> References: <852568B0.005CB5C5.00@tormta3.tor.cel.com> <38E1C69C.1BEB8F9C@ats.nld.alcatel.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <38E1C69C.1BEB8F9C@ats.nld.alcatel.nl>; from Corne Beerse on Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 11:02:20AM +0200 List-ID: On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 11:02:20AM +0200, Corne Beerse wrote: > btw, if I reply to messages received trouth parisc-linux@thepuffingroup.com, > it replies only to the originator, not to the puffin list. Other maillists > generate a Reply-to: header line with the maillist address. Can this be > added to the puffin headers too? Or are there reasons not to do it? The current behaviour is correct. If you want to reply to the person sending the message privately, you reply; if you want to reply to the list, you reply to all (possibly trimming the cc list as appropriate). With the reply-to header, there is no way to accomplish this. I'm sure I've seen more than one `Considered Harmful' document on this subject.