From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailserv2.iuinc.com (IDENT:qmailr@mailserv2.iuinc.com [206.245.164.55]) by puffin.external.hp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA21812 for ; Thu, 18 May 2000 12:40:54 -0600 From: willy@thepuffingroup.com Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 15:40:19 -0400 To: Tor Arntsen Cc: parisc-linux@thepuffingroup.com Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] New binutils available from cvs Message-ID: <20000518154019.C20055@thepuffingroup.com> References: <200005181726.TAA18863@pallas.spacetec.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200005181726.TAA18863@pallas.spacetec.no>; from Tor Arntsen on Thu, May 18, 2000 at 07:26:51PM +0200 List-ID: On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 07:26:51PM +0200, Tor Arntsen wrote: > That's what tags and branches are for! *Please* use CVS the way it was > meant to be used, don't use it like some old SCCS system! the trouble is that none of us are sufficiently skilled with CVS to cope with the tags and branches. there've been sufficient problems before when we've tried to use them to convince us that it really isn't worthwhile for this particular developmnt community. i should note that prumpf was one of the people who complained the loudest about the use of CVS tags.