From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailserv2.iuinc.com (IDENT:qmailr@mailserv2.iuinc.com [206.245.164.55]) by puffin.external.hp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA25998 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 12:58:21 -0600 Received: from milano.cup.hp.com (milano.cup.hp.com [15.8.80.76]) by palrel3.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCFCEEE4 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:59:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (grundler@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by milano.cup.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.9.3 SMKit7.02) with SMTP id MAA10121 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 12:01:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200007061901.MAA10121@milano.cup.hp.com> To: parisc-linux@thepuffingroup.com Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] untested but building 64-bit toolchain, issues/questions In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 06 Jul 2000 11:01:15 PDT." <11103.962902875@upchuck> Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 12:01:30 -0700 From: Grant Grundler List-ID: Jeffrey A Law wrote: > ie, when the "w" is included we have a system that is > capable of running 64bit binaries -- not all hppa2.0 systems can run > 64bit binaries. My brain isn't working that well today...I had the think about this for a minute...let me make it obvious to others. The limiting factor would be the OS. Eg hppa2.0n-linux (or HPUX 10.20) on a system with PA2.0 CPU. grant Grant Grundler Unix Development Lab +1.408.447.7253