From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 08:03:31 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Michael Schmitz Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Thomas Graichen , linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: openoffice on ppc anyone? Message-ID: <20001019080331.H15104@opus.bloom.county> References: <20001018172044.E15104@opus.bloom.county> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: ; from schmitz@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de on Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 10:00:20AM +0200 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 10:00:20AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > http://porting.openoffice.org/ implies anwyays the src for the tools should be > > around. Finally, gcc 2.95.2 (or 2.95.3) and glibc 2.1.3 are good for you. > > JDK 1.2.2 should be fine (Kevin?) > > The day I tried (Oct. 13) nothing besides the raw source tarball was up on > the site. I'll check again though. I've read to different and conflicting > build instructions (one suggested JDK 1.1.8, the other 1.2.2). Well, make sure to update your tree. One of the mailing lists on that page says some diffs for linux/ppc have been checked in. > I'm already using a recent gcc 2.95.3 but libc upgrades always freak me > out ... It's not as bad as it used to be. :) -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/