From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:02:05 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Michael Schmitz Cc: Michael Schmitz , Geert Uytterhoeven , Thomas Graichen , linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: openoffice on ppc anyone? Message-ID: <20001019090205.L15104@opus.bloom.county> References: <20001019080331.H15104@opus.bloom.county> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: ; from schmitz@zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de on Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 05:11:05PM +0200 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 05:11:05PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > Well, make sure to update your tree. One of the mailing lists on that page > > says some diffs for linux/ppc have been checked in. > > Yep, I've seen that - do they check in these changes under the 605 tag? Check the website. :) I believe so. > > > I'm already using a recent gcc 2.95.3 but libc upgrades always freak me > > > out ... > > > > It's not as bad as it used to be. :) > > Sure, but I barely survived one or two botched ones a while ago :-) (m68k, > not ppc though) Well I've run almost every glibc since gary thomas started releasing 'em way back when (thanks gary!) and I've been lucky so far. :) -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/