From: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
To: "Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com>
Cc: Yoann Vandoorselaere <yoann@mandrakesoft.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possible critical VIA vt82c686a chip bug (private question)
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 20:02:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001026200220.A492@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20001026190309.A372@suse.cz> <Pine.LNX.3.95.1001026134131.13342A-100000@chaos.analogic.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1001026134131.13342A-100000@chaos.analogic.com>; from root@chaos.analogic.com on Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 01:42:29PM -0400
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 01:42:29PM -0400, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> > > ../drivers/block/ide.c, line 162, on version 2.2.17 does bad things
> > > to the timer. It writes 0 to the control-word for timer 0. This
> > > does the following:
> [Snipped...]
> >
> > Well, at least on 2.4.0-test9, the above timing code is #ifed to
> > DISK_RECOVERY_TIME > 0, which in turn is #defined to 0 in
> > include/linux/ide.h.
> >
> > So this is not our problem here. Anyway I guess it's time to hunt for
> > i8259 accesses in the kernel that lack the necessary spinlock, even when
> > they're not probably the cause of the problem we see here.
>
> Okay, good.
Ok, here is a list of places within the kernel that access the PIT
timer, plus the method of locking (i386 arch only):
Usage: Lock method:
arch/i386/kernel/time.c:170: spin_lock()
arch/i386/kernel/time.c:491: spin_lock()
arch/i386/kernel/time.c:575: none (init)
arch/i386/kernel/i8259.c:491: none (init)
arch/i386/kernel/apm.c:871: cli()
arch/i386/kernel/apic.c:398: spin_lock_irqsave()
drivers/char/vt.c:121: cli()
drivers/char/ftape/lowlevel/ftape-calibr.c:80: cli()
drivers/char/ftape/lowlevel/ftape-calibr.c:99: cli()
drivers/char/joystick/analog.c:142: cli() __cli()
drivers/char/joystick/gameport.c:66: cli()
drivers/ide/hd.c:137: cli()
drivers/ide/ide.c:206: __cli()
I guess we'll need to fix this. While races here are not likely (the
most likely is a beep by vt.c at a wrong moment), they're possible.
However, these don't seem to be the cause of the problem we see here
anyway.
--
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-10-26 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <m3d7gnd31m.fsf@test1.mandrakesoft.com>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.3.95.1001026115039.12337A-100000@chaos.analogic.com>
2000-10-26 17:03 ` Possible critical VIA vt82c686a chip bug (private question) Vojtech Pavlik
2000-10-26 17:42 ` Richard B. Johnson
2000-10-26 18:02 ` Vojtech Pavlik [this message]
2000-10-26 20:11 ` Yoann Vandoorselaere
2000-10-26 20:16 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2000-10-26 21:05 ` Yoann Vandoorselaere
2000-10-26 21:15 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2000-10-26 21:24 ` Yoann Vandoorselaere
2000-10-26 21:25 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2000-10-27 10:02 ` Martin Mares
2000-10-27 10:49 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2000-10-27 10:58 ` Yoann Vandoorselaere
2000-10-27 11:01 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2000-10-27 11:16 ` Yoann Vandoorselaere
2000-10-27 11:15 ` Vojtech Pavlik
[not found] <20001026173244.B8290@suse.cz>
2000-10-27 12:04 ` bart
2000-10-27 13:41 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2000-10-28 5:39 ` TimO
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001026200220.A492@suse.cz \
--to=vojtech@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
--cc=yoann@mandrakesoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.