All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heinz J. Mauelshagen <Heinz.Mauelshagen@t-online.de>
To: pbmonday@imation.com
Cc: linux-lvm@msede.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM Partition Dependency
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 22:52:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001030225211.A26323@srv.t-online.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFF2FCF487.B6859C5B-ON86256988.00627B8E@imation.com>; from pbmonday@imation.com on Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 12:02:01PM -0600

On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 12:02:01PM -0600, pbmonday@imation.com wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> >> I'm trying to construct an LVM solution with block devices that are not
> >> located in the partition table (becuase they are not a local fixed
> physical
> >> disk).
> >Sounds like NBD or friends.
> 
> Yes, I'm actually using ENBD, but, same difference.
> 
> >It is less a question of beeing local to the machine because there's NBD
> >support build in anyway.
> 
> This is interesting...when was this support added to the LVM?

It was already in before 0.8final.

> 
> I'm not having any luck with pvcreate tool shipped with SuSE 6.4 and
> 
> LVM 0.8final.

It should work in 6.4 with NBD and major 43.
Did you run a "pvcreate -d" to figure the reason out?

> I will upgrade my LVM tools, maybe that will do the trick.
> 
> >> Just curious on how far I would have to go to "trick" or "modify" the
> LVM
> >> to accept something other than a local hard drive partition.
> >As i mentioned above: NBD should work.
> I assume you mean NBD should work natively, without any of the changes
> I mentioned to pvcreate?

Exactly.

"pvcreate -d" will help us to analyze what's going on.

> 
> Thanks for your very quick response.
> 

You're welcome :-)

> 
> 
> Paul

-- 

Regards,
Heinz      -- The LVM guy --

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Heinz Mauelshagen                                 Sistina Software Inc.
Senior Consultant/Developer                       Bartningstr. 12
                                                  64289 Darmstadt
                                                  Germany
Mauelshagen@Sistina.com                           +49 6151 7103 86
                                                       FAX 7103 96
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

       reply	other threads:[~2000-10-30 22:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <OFF2FCF487.B6859C5B-ON86256988.00627B8E@imation.com>
2000-10-30 22:52 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen [this message]
2000-10-31  7:30   ` [linux-lvm] LVM Partition Dependency Luca Berra
2000-10-31  8:39     ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2000-10-30 16:01 pbmonday
2000-10-30 18:37 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20001030225211.A26323@srv.t-online.de \
    --to=heinz.mauelshagen@t-online.de \
    --cc=Mauelshagen@sistina.com \
    --cc=linux-lvm@msede.com \
    --cc=pbmonday@imation.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.