From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rdtsc to mili secs?
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 22:22:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001114222240.A1537@bug.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3A078C65.B3C146EC@mira.net> <E13t7ht-0007Kv-00@the-village.bc.nu> <20001110154254.A33@bug.ucw.cz> <8uhps8$1tm$1@cesium.transmeta.com>
In-Reply-To: <8uhps8$1tm$1@cesium.transmeta.com>; from H. Peter Anvin on Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 01:38:16PM -0800
Hi!
> > > Sensibly configured power saving/speed throttle systems do not change the
> > > frequency at all. The duty cycle is changed and this controls the cpu
> > > performance but the tsc is constant
> >
> > Do you have an example of notebook that does powersaving like that?
> > I have 2 examples of notebooks with changing TSC speed...
> >
>
> Intel PIIX-based systems will do duty-cycle throttling, for example.
Don't think so. My toshiba is PIIX-based, AFAIC:
root@bug:~# cat /proc/pci
Bus 0, device 5, function 0:
Bridge: Intel Corporation 82371AB PIIX4 ISA (rev 2).
Bus 0, device 5, function 1:
IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82371AB PIIX4 IDE (rev 1).
Master Capable. Latency=64.
I/O at 0x1000 [0x100f].
Bus 0, device 5, function 2:
USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82371AB PIIX4 USB (rev 1).
IRQ 11.
Master Capable. Latency=64.
I/O at 0xffe0 [0xffff].
Bus 0, device 5, function 3:
Bridge: Intel Corporation 82371AB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 2).
Still, it is willing to run with RDTSC at 300MHz, 150MHz, and
40MHz. (The last one in _extreme_ cases when CPU fan fails -- running
at 40MHz is better than cooking cpu).
--
I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-15 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-05 23:09 rdtsc to mili secs? Sushil Agarwal
2000-11-06 0:10 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-11-06 0:28 ` Alan Cox
2000-11-06 0:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-11-06 0:46 ` Alan Cox
2000-11-06 17:17 ` Anton Blanchard
2000-11-06 17:27 ` Alan Cox
2000-11-07 5:00 ` Antony Suter
2000-11-07 6:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2000-11-07 12:18 ` Alan Cox
2000-11-10 14:42 ` Pavel Machek
2000-11-10 21:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2000-11-10 22:23 ` Rogier Wolff
2000-11-10 23:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2000-11-14 21:22 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2000-11-15 21:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2000-11-16 10:57 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2000-11-16 23:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2000-11-18 20:13 ` Pavel Machek
2000-11-18 23:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2000-11-19 9:21 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2000-11-18 20:12 ` Pavel Machek
2000-11-18 22:13 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2000-11-19 20:24 ` Pavel Machek
2000-11-19 21:46 ` Vojtech Pavlik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-11-06 8:15 ming_l
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001114222240.A1537@bug.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.