From: Heinz J. Mauelshagen <Heinz.Mauelshagen@t-online.de>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Cc: mge@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvm 0.9 kernel build problems
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 22:07:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001129220720.C26839@srv.t-online.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OLEAJMNOEMOMMNEIMMINIENLCBAA.pswartz@digitalrom.com>; from pswartz@digitalrom.com on Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 11:19:46AM -0600
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 11:19:46AM -0600, Patrick Swartz wrote:
> I have found a way around the problem I was having. The first time I tried
> to build the kernel I built lvm into the kernel, but I said "no" to the lvm
> proc fs question. This time I went ahead and said "yes" and everything
> worked.
I think I already fixed that bug.
It will be available with 0.9.1
> Now my question is having lvm report things to /proc will I notice any slow
> downs?
No.
Only if you read from LVM's /proc interface there's _very_ little load on
the driver.
> Just courious.
>
> Thanks for all of the hard work everyone is putting into lvm!!!!!!!
>
> Patrick
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com [mailto:linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com]On
> Behalf Of Jay Weber
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 9:42 AM
> To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
> Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvm 0.9 kernel build problems
>
>
> I had the same errors in past when compiling it on 2.2.18pre kernels.
> I believe my problem was that my /usr/src/linux didn't point back to the
> proper kernel source tree. It was a while ago though, but I'm thinking
> that solved it for me. I believe one of the files included in lvm.c is a
> <linux/*whatever*> and that didn't exist or have the proper struct or
> such.
>
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Patrick Swartz wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Could someone give me some hints to why I get the following error when
> > trying to build my kernel with the lvm 0.9patches. This box started out
> as
> > a RH7.0 with all current RH updates, then installed the stock 2.4.0-test10
> > kernel with lvm built into the kernel. This build worked. I then applied
> > the two patches for 2.4.0-test10 and they applied cleanly. I normally
> build
> > kernels using the following approach -- make dep clean bzImage modules
> > modules_install, then take care of lilo. This error happens during the
> > bzImage stage.
> >
> >
> > lvm.c: In function `lvm_do_vg_extend':
> > lvm.c:2020: warning: implicit declaration of function
> > `lvm_do_create_proc_entry_
> > of_pv'
> > lvm.c: In function `lvm_do_create_proc_entry_of_lv':
> > lvm.c:3012: `pde' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > lvm.c:3012: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > lvm.c:3012: for each function it appears in.)
> > lvm.c: At top level:
> > lvm.c:3040: warning: type mismatch with previous implicit declaration
> > lvm.c:2020: warning: previous implicit declaration of
> > `lvm_do_create_proc_entry_
> > of_pv'
> > lvm.c:3040: warning: `lvm_do_create_proc_entry_of_pv' was previously
> > implicitly
> > declared to return `int'
> > lvm.c: In function `lvm_do_create_proc_entry_of_pv':
> > lvm.c:3046: `pde' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > lvm.c: At top level:
> > lvm.c:146: warning: `lvm_short_version' defined but not used
> > make[3]: *** [lvm.o] Error 1
> > make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.0-test10/drivers/md'
> > make[2]: *** [first_rule] Error 2
> > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.0-test10/drivers/md'
> > make[1]: *** [_subdir_md] Error 2
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.0-test10/drivers'
> > make: *** [_dir_drivers] Error 2
> >
> > Thanks for your help,
> >
> > Patrick Swartz
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-lvm mailing list
> > linux-lvm@sistina.com
> > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
--
Regards,
Heinz -- The LVM guy --
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc.
Senior Consultant/Developer Bartningstr. 12
64289 Darmstadt
Germany
Mauelshagen@Sistina.com +49 6151 7103 86
FAX 7103 96
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-29 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-29 15:05 [linux-lvm] lvm 0.9 kernel build problems Patrick Swartz
2000-11-29 15:41 ` Jay Weber
2000-11-29 17:19 ` Patrick Swartz
2000-11-29 17:22 ` Jay Weber
2000-11-29 22:07 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen [this message]
2000-11-29 21:19 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2000-11-29 21:47 ` Falcon
2000-11-30 8:44 ` Chewie
2000-11-30 10:41 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-11-30 11:42 ` Eric M. Hopper
2000-11-30 18:46 ` Rik van Riel
2000-11-30 21:01 ` OT: " Chewie
2000-11-30 3:48 ` Steven Lembark
2000-11-29 22:08 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001129220720.C26839@srv.t-online.de \
--to=heinz.mauelshagen@t-online.de \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
--cc=mge@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.