From: Arnaud Installe <ainstalle@filepool.com>
To: David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: high load & poor interactivity on fast thread creation
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 10:47:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001201104745.C1413@bartok.filepool.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20001130081443.A8118@bach.iverlek.kotnet.org> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0011301459250.17363-100000@dlang.diginsite.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0011301459250.17363-100000@dlang.diginsite.com>; from david.lang@digitalinsight.com on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 03:00:10PM -0800
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 03:00:10PM -0800, David Lang wrote:
> try the 2.4 test kernels. I had a situation of poor performance with lots
> of processes and saw a dramatic improvement with the 2.4 kernel.
So what load average should I expect Linux versions 2.2 and 2.4 to perform
well under ? I'm wondering what would be the best way to solve this
problem: limit the number of processes created during a certain time span;
check if the load average isn't too high before creating a new thread (and
go to sleep if it isn't); or something else ?
Thanks very much BTW ! The list has always been very helpful. :-)
Arnaud
> > When creating a lot of Java threads per second linux slows down to a
> > crawl. I don't think this happens on NT, probably because NT doesn't
> > create new threads as fast as Linux does.
> >
> > Is there a way (setting ?) to solve this problem ? Rate-limit the number
> > of threads created ? The problem occurred on linux 2.2, IBM Java 1.1.8.
--
Arnaud Installe <ainstalle@filepool.com>
Man has never reconciled himself to the ten commandments.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-01 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-30 7:14 high load & poor interactivity on fast thread creation Arnaud Installe
2000-11-30 14:47 ` Ray Bryant
2000-11-30 16:11 ` Arnaud Installe
2000-11-30 16:37 ` James A Sutherland
2000-12-27 11:01 ` Ruth Ivimey-Cook
2000-12-27 17:11 ` Michael Rothwell
2000-12-27 17:25 ` Gregory Maxwell
2000-12-27 17:32 ` Larry McVoy
2000-12-27 19:43 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-11-30 16:12 ` Alan Cox
2000-11-30 23:00 ` David Lang
2000-12-01 9:47 ` Arnaud Installe [this message]
2000-12-01 21:20 ` David Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001201104745.C1413@bartok.filepool.com \
--to=ainstalle@filepool.com \
--cc=david.lang@digitalinsight.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.