From: Florian Heinz <sky@sysv.de>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Some problems with the raid-stuff in 2.4.0-test12pre3
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 10:52:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001201105233.D672@inode.real-linux.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20001130123322.A672@inode.real-linux.de> <14887.2273.174231.960990@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au>
In-Reply-To: <14887.2273.174231.960990@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au>; from neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au on Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 01:11:45PM +1100
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 01:11:45PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Thursday November 30, sky@dereference.de wrote:
> > Hello people,
> >
> > I have some trouble with the raid-stuff.
> > My machine is a Pentium-III, 256 MB ram and 7 scsi-disks (IBM DNES-318350W
> > 17B). I'm using raid5 for 6 of these disks (chunk-size 8).
> > Machine boots, I do mkraid /dev/md0 and then mke2fs /dev/md0 and that's
> > where the problems start. mkfs tries to write 684 inode-tables and after the
> > first 30 it gets very slow. ps ax (with wchan) tells me it hangs in
> > wakeup_bdflush.
> > I'm rather sure it's related to the raidcode, because without raid the disks
> > work as expected.
> > I'm using an Adaptec 7892A with the aic7xxx-driver, I have disabled the TCQ
> > and the extra checks for the new queueing code, but I have tried with both
> > activated, too.
> > No related messages from the kernel in the syslog.
> > It worked fine with 2.2.x.
>
> Is it just "very slow", but it eventually finishes, it is it so slow,
> that it actually stops and doesn't make any progress at all?
>
> raid5 in 2.4 is definately slower than in 2.2. Could that be all that
> you are seeing?
It's so slow that it's unusable. Especially writing. open() and
close()-calls often hang for 20 seconds or more.
write-calls hang for 3-4 seconds. This has to be a bug.
But yes, after a long time, it finishes ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-01 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-30 11:33 Some problems with the raid-stuff in 2.4.0-test12pre3 Florian Heinz
2000-12-01 2:11 ` Neil Brown
2000-12-01 9:52 ` Florian Heinz [this message]
2000-12-01 19:56 ` Neil Brown
2000-12-01 22:25 ` Florian Heinz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001201105233.D672@inode.real-linux.de \
--to=sky@sysv.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.