From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: John David Anglin <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
Cc: alan@linuxcare.com.au, law@cygnus.com, rhirst@linuxcare.com,
parisc-linux@thepuffingroup.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: pa reload problem
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:39:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001208173948.B4198@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200012090107.UAA28226@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>; from John David Anglin on Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 08:07:23PM -0500
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 08:07:23PM -0500, John David Anglin wrote:
> It is my impression that the MEM would pass as a general_operand unless
> the volatile flag is set. It will pass GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS. Thus,
> the general_operand test doesn't look like it will work.
Your GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS will accept the UNSPEC?
The mind boggles. Why, then, is this strange beast its own insn?
Perhaps that is part of the bug...
r~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-09 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-01 0:23 [parisc-linux] pa reload problem Alan Modra
2000-12-01 6:12 ` John David Anglin
2000-12-01 7:00 ` Alan Modra
2000-12-02 7:33 ` John David Anglin
2000-12-02 7:48 ` John David Anglin
2000-12-02 23:28 ` John David Anglin
2000-12-05 19:42 ` John David Anglin
2000-12-06 20:41 ` John David Anglin
2000-12-07 0:16 ` Richard Henderson
2000-12-07 0:57 ` John David Anglin
2000-12-07 1:18 ` John David Anglin
2000-12-08 22:05 ` John David Anglin
2000-12-08 23:45 ` Richard Henderson
2000-12-09 1:07 ` John David Anglin
2000-12-09 1:39 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2000-12-09 3:12 ` John David Anglin
2000-12-09 4:05 ` Jeffrey A Law
2000-12-09 6:55 ` Richard Henderson
2000-12-11 17:29 ` Jeffrey A Law
2000-12-11 18:48 ` John David Anglin
2000-12-11 23:51 ` Alan Modra
2000-12-09 7:52 ` Alan Modra
2000-12-09 7:55 ` Richard Henderson
2000-12-09 8:35 ` Alan Modra
2000-12-09 13:57 ` Alan Modra
2000-12-09 18:56 ` Richard Henderson
2000-12-09 23:35 ` Alan Modra
2000-12-22 17:21 ` John David Anglin
2000-12-30 19:05 ` John David Anglin
2001-01-01 23:24 ` Jeffrey A Law
2000-12-11 21:27 ` Michael Meissner
2000-12-02 12:35 ` Alan Modra
2000-12-02 19:43 ` Richard Henderson
2000-12-02 23:01 ` John David Anglin
2000-12-03 1:50 ` Richard Henderson
2000-12-03 3:30 ` Alan Modra
2000-12-02 23:08 ` John David Anglin
2000-12-04 1:41 ` Alan Modra
2000-12-04 18:41 ` Richard Hirst
[not found] <20001201202613.E7166@linuxcare.com>
2000-12-02 7:15 ` Alan Modra
2000-12-04 18:40 ` Richard Hirst
2000-12-04 22:55 ` Alan Modra
2000-12-04 23:08 ` John David Anglin
2000-12-04 23:59 ` Alan Modra
2000-12-05 0:50 ` John David Anglin
2000-12-05 5:33 ` Alan Modra
[not found] <no.id>
2000-12-14 0:48 ` John David Anglin
2000-12-14 3:43 ` Jeffrey A Law
2000-12-14 16:40 ` John David Anglin
2000-12-27 20:08 ` Jeffrey A Law
2000-12-28 5:18 ` John David Anglin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001208173948.B4198@redhat.com \
--to=rth@redhat.com \
--cc=alan@linuxcare.com.au \
--cc=dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=law@cygnus.com \
--cc=parisc-linux@thepuffingroup.com \
--cc=rhirst@linuxcare.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.