From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha@gnu.org>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@cygnus.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.or" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.2.18 signal.h
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 14:52:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001216145242.C25150@inspiron.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20001215205721.I17781@inspiron.random> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012161337220.1433-100000@bee.lk>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012161337220.1433-100000@bee.lk>; from anuradha@gnu.org on Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 01:53:50PM +0600
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 01:53:50PM +0600, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote:
> GCC will complain the absence of a statement after `out1:out2:`, but not
> two complains for `out1' and `out2', because they form a single entity.
I understand the formal specs (the email from Michael is very clear). What I'm
saying is that as the `dummy' statement is redoundant information but you're
requiring us to put it to build a labeled-statement, you could been even more
lazy and not define the labeled-statement as a statement so requiring us to put
a dummy statement after every label. That would been the same kind of issue
we're facing right now (but of course defining a labeled-statement as a
statement and allowing recursion makes the formal specs even simpler so that
probably wouldn't happen that easily).
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-16 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-15 16:29 2.2.18 signal.h Mike Black
2000-12-15 16:56 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-12-15 17:07 ` Richard B. Johnson
2000-12-15 17:43 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-12-15 17:59 ` Franz Sirl
2000-12-15 18:34 ` Richard B. Johnson
2000-12-15 18:50 ` Alan Cox
2000-12-15 19:06 ` Horst von Brand
2000-12-15 20:15 ` Michael Meissner
2000-12-15 18:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-12-15 19:18 ` Ulrich Drepper
2000-12-15 19:57 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-12-15 20:09 ` Rik van Riel
2000-12-15 20:22 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-12-16 7:53 ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
2000-12-16 13:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2000-12-19 16:53 ` Michael Meissner
2000-12-15 19:55 ` Rik van Riel
2000-12-15 20:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-12-21 18:18 ` Thomas Dodd
2001-01-02 16:55 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-12-15 20:31 ` Michael Meissner
2000-12-17 5:27 ` Albert D. Cahalan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-12-15 21:56 Jesse Pollard
2000-12-15 22:22 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001216145242.C25150@inspiron.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=anuradha@gnu.org \
--cc=drepper@cygnus.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.