From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.2.19pre3
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 20:56:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001222205601.A13546@athlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E149GRm-0003sX-00@the-village.bc.nu> <20001222213358.A5829@elektroni.ee.tut.fi>
In-Reply-To: <20001222213358.A5829@elektroni.ee.tut.fi>; from kaukasoi@elektroni.ee.tut.fi on Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 09:33:58PM +0200
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 09:33:58PM +0200, Petri Kaukasoina wrote:
> I think in case of BIOS-88 it now sees 1 Meg less than should. int 15, ah=88
Yes, you're right, sorry. Here a backout against 2.2.19pre3:
--- 2.2.19pre3-e820/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c.~1~ Fri Dec 22 14:51:26 2000
+++ 2.2.19pre3-e820/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c Fri Dec 22 20:54:27 2000
@@ -376,8 +376,7 @@
e820.nr_map = 0;
add_memory_region(0, i386_endbase, E820_RAM);
- add_memory_region(HIGH_MEMORY, (mem_size << 10)-HIGH_MEMORY,
- E820_RAM);
+ add_memory_region(HIGH_MEMORY, (mem_size << 10), E820_RAM);
}
printk("BIOS-provided physical RAM map:\n");
print_memory_map(who);
The other part of the 2.4.x patch is still valid.
Thanks,
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-22 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-22 0:52 Linux 2.2.19pre3 Alan Cox
2000-12-22 3:40 ` Mitch Adair
2000-12-22 15:32 ` Petri Kaukasoina
2000-12-22 15:53 ` Richard B. Johnson
2000-12-22 16:02 ` Chad Schwartz
2000-12-22 16:23 ` Alan Cox
2000-12-22 16:25 ` Chad Schwartz
2000-12-22 16:43 ` Richard B. Johnson
2000-12-22 17:54 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2000-12-22 18:13 ` Richard B. Johnson
2000-12-22 16:21 ` Alan Cox
2000-12-22 19:33 ` Petri Kaukasoina
2000-12-22 19:56 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2000-12-23 12:05 ` Willy Tarreau
2000-12-28 1:18 ` Matthias Andree
2000-12-28 2:37 ` Alan Cox
2000-12-28 10:23 ` Matthias Andree
2000-12-28 12:20 ` Alan Cox
2000-12-28 13:53 ` Linux 2.2.18: /proc/apm slows system time (was: Linux 2.2.19pre3) Matthias Andree
2000-12-28 14:14 ` Matthias Andree
2000-12-29 12:42 ` Erik Mouw
2000-12-30 12:39 ` Matthias Andree
2000-12-30 17:01 ` Alan Cox
2000-12-30 17:38 ` Erik Mouw
2000-12-30 17:50 ` Alan Cox
2000-12-30 17:39 ` Matthias Andree
2000-12-31 10:34 ` Matthias Andree
2000-12-31 11:28 ` Chris Wedgwood
2000-12-31 13:32 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-02 13:52 ` [PATCH] CMOS locking for 2.4 (was: /proc/apm slows system time) Paul Gortmaker
2000-12-31 13:37 ` Linux 2.2.18: /proc/apm slows system time (was: Linux 2.2.19pre3) Alan Cox
2000-12-31 15:50 ` Erik Mouw
2000-12-31 16:13 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-02 16:32 ` Matthias Andree
2001-01-02 17:31 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-03 22:02 ` Matthias Andree
2000-12-28 11:14 ` Linux 2.2.19pre3 Guest section DW
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001222205601.A13546@athlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.