From: Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@nitnet.com.br>
To: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP keepalive seems to send to only one port
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2000 22:46:54 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001225224654.A2080@flower.cesarb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20001223223814.A2281@flower.cesarb> <NCBBLIEPOCNJOAEKBEAKOEDJMKAA.davids@webmaster.com>
In-Reply-To: <NCBBLIEPOCNJOAEKBEAKOEDJMKAA.davids@webmaster.com>; from davids@webmaster.com on Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 04:33:07PM -0800
On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 04:33:07PM -0800, David Schwartz wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 04:19:31PM -0800, David Schwartz wrote:
>
> > > > This means that keepalive is useless for keeping alive more than
> > > > one connection
> > > > to a given host.
>
> > > Actually, keepalive is useless for keeping connections
> > > alive anyway. It's
> > > very badly named. It's purpose is to detect dead peers, not keep peers
> > > alive.
> >
> > Then what do you do when you are behind a NAT?
>
> If the administrator of the NAT meant for you to have a permanent mapping,
> she would have put one there. Using keepalives to hold a NAT entry open
> indefinitely without activity would be considered abuse in most NAT
> configurations. The NAT might not consider a keepalive to be activity anyway
> (arguably, it shouldn't).
Well, consider the scenario of an application which opens a control connection
and a data connection, and the data connection remains idle for some hours
while you get to the beginning of the queue, and then the transfer starts. The
data connection is not open forever, and the timeout (and the periodic pings)
is on the control connection.
The problem is that, after four or more hours of waiting, when the other side
finally starts sending, the NAT has already forgotten about the connection.
(In case someone is wondering, the application I'm talking about is fidelio.
Which is pretty useless on busy sites behind a NAT because of that.)
--
Cesar Eduardo Barros
cesarb@nitnet.com.br
cesarb@dcc.ufrj.br
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-26 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-23 23:31 TCP keepalive seems to send to only one port Cesar Eduardo Barros
2000-12-24 0:19 ` David Schwartz
2000-12-24 0:38 ` Cesar Eduardo Barros
2000-12-24 1:52 ` James Morris
2000-12-24 2:20 ` Cesar Eduardo Barros
2000-12-25 15:27 ` Igmar Palsenberg
2000-12-25 14:58 ` Cesar Eduardo Barros
2000-12-26 0:33 ` David Schwartz
2000-12-26 0:46 ` Cesar Eduardo Barros [this message]
2000-12-26 0:59 ` David Schwartz
2000-12-24 9:14 ` Andi Kleen
2000-12-24 14:12 ` Cesar Eduardo Barros
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-12-27 2:00 Bernd Eckenfels
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001225224654.A2080@flower.cesarb \
--to=cesarb@nitnet.com.br \
--cc=davids@webmaster.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.