From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Peter Osterlund <peter.osterlund@mailbox.swipnet.se>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-parport@torque.net,
tim@cyberelk.demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: Printing to off-line printer in 2.4.0-prerelease
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 01:41:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010104014115.C6256@athlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2k88czda4.fsf@ppro.localdomain> <20010103201344.A3203@athlon.random> <m2hf3gz6yc.fsf@ppro.localdomain> <20010103223504.L32185@athlon.random> <m266jww55q.fsf@ppro.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <m266jww55q.fsf@ppro.localdomain>; from peter.osterlund@mailbox.swipnet.se on Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:08:01AM +0100
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:08:01AM +0100, Peter Osterlund wrote:
> What do you think about the following patch? It also works for all the
> tests mentioned in my previous message.
I'm worried somebody needed to disable LP_CAREFUL to print, probably it's not a
big deal to keep it. About the lp_wait_ready that's what I had in mind with the
"rework" thing and it looks fine. However parport_write can still could silenty
discard data, but maybe it can't notice errors with some handshake. I didn't
checked the details of the DMA based handshake so Tim needs to comment if
this can be considered a final/right fix (I hope it's not ;).
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-04 1:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-03 18:44 Printing to off-line printer in 2.4.0-prerelease Peter Osterlund
2001-01-03 19:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-03 21:00 ` Peter Osterlund
2001-01-03 21:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-04 0:08 ` Peter Osterlund
2001-01-04 0:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2001-01-04 1:09 ` Peter Osterlund
2001-01-04 1:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-04 11:17 ` Tim Waugh
2001-01-04 9:27 ` Tim Waugh
2001-01-04 13:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-04 11:20 ` Tim Waugh
2001-01-04 13:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-04 14:20 ` Tim Waugh
2001-01-04 14:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-04 14:54 ` Tim Waugh
2001-01-04 19:45 ` Peter Osterlund
2001-01-04 19:07 ` Peter Osterlund
2001-01-04 21:52 ` Tim Waugh
2001-01-05 0:33 ` Peter Osterlund
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-01-04 15:30 Jesse Pollard
2001-01-04 19:22 ` Gunther Mayer
2001-01-05 1:13 ` Jesse Pollard
2001-01-04 23:20 ` David Ford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010104014115.C6256@athlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parport@torque.net \
--cc=peter.osterlund@mailbox.swipnet.se \
--cc=tim@cyberelk.demon.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.