All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
To: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: which bk version to use (was re: 2.4.0  & ac1)
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 09:12:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010108091255.A3077@work.bitmover.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010108100432.L19404@opus.bloom.county>


On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:04:32AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 05:00:36PM +0000, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> >
> > On  Mon, Jan 8, 2001,  Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > >> so what's on the rsync linuxppc_2_3 ?
> > >
> > > No idea.  It might be 2_4 it might not be. :)
> >
> > can you post something when it is known?
> > (I find rsync very useful).
>
> I'll ask.
>
> > > The 2_4 tree is building.  If it's not building, report it here.
> >
> > OK... supposing I get bk... which version of BK do I need?...
> >
> > I ask because I read a comment on bk-user that the latest version may not be
> > right for the PPC trees... is that an up-to-date statement?
>
> Unfortunatly, probably.  The "stable" bk (ie 1.2) is what you want.

Yup.  You don't want to switch to the 2.0beta stuff yet, we need to redo the
triggers one more time.
--
---
Larry McVoy            	 lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

      reply	other threads:[~2001-01-08 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-01-08 17:00 which bk version to use (was re: 2.4.0 & ac1) Iain Sandoe
2001-01-08 17:04 ` Tom Rini
2001-01-08 17:12   ` Larry McVoy [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010108091255.A3077@work.bitmover.com \
    --to=lm@bitmover.com \
    --cc=iain@sandoe.co.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.