From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 14:21:56 -0700 From: Cort Dougan To: Gabriel Paubert Cc: diekema_jon , linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Root keys on bk://bitkeeper.fsmlabs.com:5000 have changed Message-ID: <20010108142156.Z8686@hq.fsmlabs.com> References: <20010107031314.G13210@hq.fsmlabs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: ; from Gabriel Paubert on Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:03:36AM +0100 Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: } Nice, I have a copy of the 2.3 tree with my own patches which are quite a } long list of changes and merges. Recloning is _not_ an option... } } Fortunately I was still using copy of Linus tree in my own repositories } which I maintain personnally as my main development branch. I was } seriously considering switching to the fsmlabs bk trees, now it will never } happen, ever... Changes from 2.2 to 2.3 and from 2.3 to 2.4 will not be effortless changes, with or without any revision control. Each version is a different repository and that's not going to change. I'm happy to see you didn't start using the trees before you realized this (and had to put work in on maintaining code). I'm also glad to not have you bring unreasonable expectations to our development tree. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/