All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mo6 <sjoos@pandora.be>
To: Robert Kaiser <rob@sysgo.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <bgerst@didntduck.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ?
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 20:51:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010110205127.B982@pandora.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01010922090000.02630@rob> <3A5B7F76.ABDFED7A@didntduck.org> <01010922264400.02737@rob>
In-Reply-To: <01010922264400.02737@rob>; from rob@sysgo.de on Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 10:17:47PM +0100

On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 10:17:47PM +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote:
> On Die, 09 Jan 2001 you wrote:
> > Robert Kaiser wrote:
> > > I can't seem to get the new 2.4.0 kernel running on a 386 CPU.
> > > The kernel was built for a 386 Processor, Math emulation has been enabled.
> > > I tried three different 386 boards. Execution seems to get as far as
> > > pagetable_init() in arch/i386/mm/init.c, then it falls back into the BIOS as
> > > if someone had pressed the reset button. The same kernel boots fine on
> > > 486 and Pentium Systems.
> > > 
> > > Any ideas/suggestions ?
> > 
> > 
> > is "Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor
> > mode... " the last thing you see before the reset?
> > 
> 
> No, I don't see _any_ messages from the kernel. The last thing I see is
> "Uncompressing Linux... Ok, booting the kernel." 

I dug up an old amd 386 and started compiling kernels for it with gcc 2.95.2:

2.4.0 : doesn't boot, same symptoms as you, Robert, so you're not imagining 
	things :-)
2.2.19pre6 : compiles, boots and runs poifectly
2.3.51 : doesn't compile
2.3.99-pre1 : hrm, *cough*
2.3.99-pre2 : *tsjoum*
2.3.39: compiles and boots okay

here is where I got bored :-)

okay, anyone, which 2.3.x kernels should compile okay ?

With kind regards,
Sven
-- 
If the odds are a million to one against something occurring, chances
are 50-50 it will.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-01-10 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-01-09 20:53 Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ? Robert Kaiser
2001-01-09 21:15 ` Brian Gerst
2001-01-09 21:17   ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-09 21:46     ` Brian Gerst
2001-01-09 22:17       ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-09 22:57         ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-09 23:44           ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-10  0:19             ` Alex Buell
2001-01-10  0:20             ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-10  0:24               ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-10 16:00               ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-10 21:29                 ` Tom G. Christensen
2001-01-10 22:04                   ` X performance on 2.4.0 v.s. 2.4.0-test12 Alan Olsen
2001-01-09 23:03         ` Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ? Brian Gerst
2001-01-09 23:04           ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-09 23:28             ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-01-09 23:42               ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-10  1:48                 ` Miles Lane
2001-01-10 15:25                   ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-10 21:04                     ` Miles Lane
2001-01-10 16:28             ` Paul Gortmaker
2001-01-15 18:38               ` [SOLVED + PATCH] " Robert Kaiser
2001-01-15 19:11                 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-09 22:44       ` Timur Tabi
2001-01-09 21:59     ` Brian Gerst
2001-01-10 19:51     ` mo6 [this message]
2001-01-10 20:18       ` Brian Gerst
2001-01-10 21:53         ` mo6
2001-01-11 12:20     ` mo6
2001-01-10  3:53 ` Tom Leete
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-01-10  9:25 richardj_moore
2001-01-10 14:19 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-10 15:04   ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-10 15:49     ` Alan Cox
2001-01-10 16:02       ` Robert Kaiser
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.04.10101101000130.27018-100000@hantana.pdn.ac.lk>
2001-01-10 15:37 ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-10 17:16 Petr Vandrovec

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010110205127.B982@pandora.be \
    --to=sjoos@pandora.be \
    --cc=bgerst@didntduck.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rob@sysgo.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.