From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <hch@ns.caldera.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:38:17 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@ns.caldera.de>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] nagging about the LVM usage survey
Message-ID: <20010111153817.A25307@caldera.de>
References: <20010111083114.A381363@brule.borg>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20010111083114.A381363@brule.borg>; from okeefe@brule.borg.umn.edu on Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 08:31:14AM -0600
Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@sistina.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.sistina.com/pipermail/linux-lvm/>
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Cc: Matthew O'Keefe <okeefe@brule.borg.umn.edu>

On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 08:31:14AM -0600, Matthew O'Keefe wrote:
> If more LVM users and developers fill these out and tell        
> us what they are doing with LVM, and what their immediate needs are,
> we can better understand where to go in the future.
> We are now starting to define the feature set 
> for LVM 5.0.

Why 5.0?

	Christoph

-- 
Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.