From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 02:43:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 02:43:22 -0500 Received: from gate.in-addr.de ([212.8.193.158]:49928 "HELO mx.in-addr.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 02:43:05 -0500 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 08:42:59 +0100 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree To: Christoph Lameter Cc: khttpd-users@zgp.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: khttpd beaten by boa Message-ID: <20010112084259.B441@marowsky-bree.de> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.3i In-Reply-To: ; from "Christoph Lameter" on 2001-01-11T22:20:56 X-Ctuhulu: HASTUR Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2001-01-11T22:20:56, Christoph Lameter said: > Then we decided to switch persistant connection off... But boa still wins. > > What is wrong here? I would expect transferates of a 3-4 megabytes over a > localhost interface. The file is certainly in some kind of cache. This just goes on to show that khttpd is unnecessary kernel bloat and can be "just as well" handled by a userspace application, minus some rather very special cases which do not justify its inclusion into the main kernel. Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Brée -- Perfection is our goal, excellence will be tolerated. -- J. Yahl - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/