From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 13:19:50 -0800 From: Charles Duffy Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM 0.9.1beta1 vgscan segfault when run with -d Message-ID: <20010113131950.A974@mvista.com> References: <20010112223600.A846@mvista.com> <20010113121143.I21587@srv.t-online.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bKyqfOwhbdpXa4YI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010113121143.I21587@srv.t-online.de>; from Heinz.Mauelshagen@t-online.de on Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 12:11:43PM +0000 Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: To: linux-lvm@sistina.com --bKyqfOwhbdpXa4YI Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="DKU6Jbt7q3WqK7+M" Content-Disposition: inline --DKU6Jbt7q3WqK7+M Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable No, I am not using devfs. Yes, I ran 'vgscan -d'. Indeed, I meant to attach the associated log (unless it was stripped by the list software). I'll try again. Also, I misreported the version number. It was 0.9.1beta1 under which this occured. On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 12:11:43PM +0000, Heinz J. Mauelshagen wrote: >=20 > Charles, is this under devfs? > Side remark: you probably run "vgscan -d", right? >=20 > Didn't get the attachement, sorry. Send it again please. >=20 > On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 10:36:00PM -0800, Charles Duffy wrote: > > Howdy. I'm experiencing some difficulties while transitioning from LVM > > 0.8i to 0.9. > >=20 > > vgscan reports: > >=20 > > vgscan -- ERROR "vg_read_with_pv_and_lv(): allocated LE of LV": can't > > get data of volume group "vg01" from physical volume(s) > >=20 > > When I try to recieve more info (by running vgscan with "-D"), I > > recieve a segfault. > >=20 > > This appears to be happening inside pv_read_uuidlist, at the memset on > > line 91 (I added some extra debug() calls to determine this). The > > attached log (from the original, unpatched version) should help by > > giving some context. > >=20 > > Frankly, I don't know why this is happening -- more than sufficient > > space appears to be allocated beforehand -- but, as long as one rules > > out a bug in debug(), I don't see any other way 'round it. > >=20 > > Thanks for your help. --DKU6Jbt7q3WqK7+M Content-Type: application/x-bzip2 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="lvmlog.bz2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 QlpoOTFBWSZTWecMYVwAIvF/7//+sAvQY///v6eVir/v3/DAwEAEgADEgUAIxEDo7+AMPlPg SAA7ZQAAKAAAAAAC6QaFNT0E1H6oNNA0BoAxA0MhoANAAA0AANBozUO9qmp/6qjBDRkwRpiB tEwATIyMACYIMABMQwQxDgABoAGgDQAAGjEAA0AAAAADQA4AAaABoA0AABoxAANAAAAAA0AE iSE2khkgGhtRo000GgaAyZAAyDQ0GQaADIZNNApSIgmiJiI0TJoDTTTRpoGjQAaHqAADamjQ AAA2ksQEIHzj73b+7TZioEkQTcoVu/wFTcZpLGBCBQXWvY1tletleDTLHEkhGtJHh1YSycgB BHKAAZCVLAACAP3BoyJA0QvilZmKk02htJrmohLrUio4abQzm59lPDmcAZoluKKYJheS42dn 0V1IIdxu+SlJKstStO1vZzSmMpokWAygrsu2rHZInZQkVFY3qbrdeVeK5U3XHXTbMsuVY4Dz K4LXb079/Lsh1da7xpy2OBwxw9ON56Z6enGefFOrjPTNd6qyOBHAuKbDMK3E1imwNOGw4hmM mbaxrasbDhODYjeSjBGCMs48uN8Zy3vaGc4Gg1WaGBgwe+FLRjLV3kgx1UX3YwHMywEaA22D TTBppsY22NtjbYNNMGxjbBB6/RhER59E0dOpkdHxulfcpzLlLlNtbSwrYb+znTmkcyjkR05c BwjgNRoaGnispcNs1hrWtDXxwbA338muRwx1dq1U2yqNYOE3Ib3xjZ2rtvpWHFZV3cK0dN68 uC1zlmamZjp0RgYlgjJONBqlMGDxo4ht4wZo5GLcxedI35MzWWs1nx63trWmtaZmst63toS8 2PiM3hUMxgwXc+m+vdWUpR/O5fM+RxT1s+u8o9TZ8dexoe1/F8L9tAXOVEY7QftO7yd2ZmXu adSo3MqPA6qHysRF7Z5VyvmVocAez2a/Y93q7KeZzjtv5HkzEzGYzGZWZV92wYMQwUrEHzpO fwHkyTnnIARgQBgcYyEiCEENwHAjAgDA5ACBAUuQ+F25wI6VMKTQGNQQVPO5+b0a4yIiTqTk Rbh27vlmHvZrVIa+RUCahJPe/GHj6XB5TKZUwyYZMMmVkMMmfRpAtOCbFlXiBBJiEQ0gKtLD QG7HcMkZhdX7nU9vvOF7da+23rWtI1gemVab1ROaqwN4pmCMxnGoNXHLVrS1a1q1prWLTFm/ Xpo9PD90uPJz6dzMmuanhPSp0e7p0w65R7Hd4eVU8VTzfNd03VOSR2vyMXFw4EjqSOz6sVPD tpFTiKmiReDPYwkWYSLZItetM+rVSeO7KdMuvBVJ1VSd/38EdE895rq6Y6u3UI7COHrDr+/3 bByH44n0BmQzDMlknzwPozJsb1SPrYKjPxNZmMq+c6GOnqeQ+S+5iCfTXvL9Ifeh+WI+eH6o 4HAcCOA4G95Zbvv97zMzLLetc6tb3tWy3OOK4S4K4lHCPpDinNZVzS5MwRzmQ5HJ805Aee3W NunHDiOHG22MTYdRHAdRwOA4EcBwPl10dGMaY1mWXS6b3mZmWW9awysrDRvbWMw6mVvKzGZW ZRpG8LMZk7c5jA4HOVm9NYzdSpoVNUEnKUpKUpYmvocWVWmo8k4mfvugArwAbfFBUfWpKPob M+foKjYVHk/lePvn5j+WlKPoPsfwLTu9f89JR8dJR6UlHYKjgKjT7FJR2dfja5pKPS+b9Eff PuM2xr7IVfgKc2B+FUB+ug4QfgsET8mcrFulllMymMmLE2IYcMD9UYGq5ZKjGETg0MjAxgpm AMFDVPpjhXxBoOLYaCrubX1DWssR0Ecu9YM6Btbw4GH11OeCHLsHR4OwdjoHxNAPH414+LHB xSdfz6gPOUfZCrA7motj5bQeykNP1kHmVy7V2DTl3j9DKLXPeoDSfE0g5qAySo31OGKVG0mt LyfZ1HTZpoeYGzANVuMxgbZNTRpRtbO4Vb86iwKuxRPqVF5J6g7NcVINZgHIdPtPf1liZkWZ Qslae7YqzdDbdWJpe18l8G6LkYGBV7Q6uJS984UqOhuOWZZWZ7I2/R9rlcsetjvepxFK+Gj2 6nulFeF7afBYPIxWR40DyOZMRao4HhD0VmZmTMzMzMsxUR8hB4qLJVQ5Cr5mGj+oBpeGoHo7 vlDk7vg9bK7D4eXX0upbsdRA7GB9rvh0fAFX7sqo6ltHqwM9zJKjyDPlnPeL4WDxxQ9G3VsN PY949cnRJB7vfigcBh6LNBhdl1YVYyI4ebjq6XyWDwI2WZLMZmWWMzMi6OB1Ye/OhytydH2x w8hnDs8qvQ31dvD4Rh4BzV7HvatB717FofLPlPXeDzLC987vkr2uKOWMIMwh0R7AOggdjfMX Iwp7A8Bom1Urq7T0B7XvoMtvBsPJYXsIcup8w4eR5u8nW9GOA8gwy0Zeddlp7QPgOF7Pd3dB jArtxnca522OBVycnnXqildBuw43R7uK1yHK2OXSVUcML1OS9vd4q7AdnB3nrgXh3PYPJ7J1 cSeIDwB6vKhmSDGETKsqLBDEyQwPR3c1zfrSxDrSQetwdVxKqMp3dwMEAuiLYBvlsJ6mp05Z UZvjVFJTl0eqKvamqPNXR9LPiqh3uwVXKsInM+oBhwihBsJbKrDZ7rTgo0vVv2bhvowrK5JK NYHwf1/MIWsmYbEBCv4DctBtOGi4vLFW/hBrsR/GTYJGyDmzFtQg2GI2WCV1gYdqAKu6KGUD zKQcrqkQqjzhLMB1LsyX/V7Rh5LM2nEdYtSKAtSMPQf4u5IpwoSHOGMK4A== --DKU6Jbt7q3WqK7+M-- --bKyqfOwhbdpXa4YI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6YMZ2r/O29KUQmJURAhuKAJ44ooGGXFjmQqEnmPChERfbJItC4wCdFmI2 l41mEpFt60aotI+s5ttCs4o= =Qap4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bKyqfOwhbdpXa4YI--