All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: kaos@ocs.com.au (Keith Owens)
Cc: Werner.Almesberger@epfl.ch (Werner Almesberger),
	david_luyer@pacific.net.au (David Luyer),
	alan@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: "Pass module parameters" to built-in drivers
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 21:55:23 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200101222155.f0MLtNe01781@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5766.980181036@ocs3.ocs-net> from "Keith Owens" at Jan 23, 2001 03:30:36 AM

Keith Owens writes:
> It is part of my total Makefile rewrite for 2.5.  A clean
> implementation of module parameters mapping to setup code requires the
> mapping of a source file to the module it is linked into.  That
> information is difficult to extract with the current Makefile system,
> my rewrite makes it easy.

Hmm, don't we already have all that __setup() stuff laying around?  Ok,
it might not be built into the .o for modules, but it could be.  Could
we not do something along the lines of:

1. User passes parameters on the kernel command line.
2. modprobe reads the kernel command line and sorts out those that
   correspond to the __setup() stuff in the module being loaded.
3. modprobe combines in any extra settings from /etc/modules.conf

IIRC, this would satisfy the original posters intentions, presumably
without too much hastle?

--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-01-23  6:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-01-21  4:54 PATCH: "Pass module parameters" to built-in drivers David Luyer
2001-01-21  5:09 ` Keith Owens
2001-01-22 15:56   ` Werner Almesberger
2001-01-22 16:30     ` Keith Owens
2001-01-22 18:08       ` Werner Almesberger
2001-01-22 21:55       ` Russell King [this message]
2001-01-23  6:37         ` Keith Owens
2001-01-23  9:18     ` Richard Guenther
2001-01-24 13:32   ` Paul Gortmaker
2001-01-24 20:57     ` Keith Owens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200101222155.f0MLtNe01781@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=Werner.Almesberger@epfl.ch \
    --cc=alan@redhat.com \
    --cc=david_luyer@pacific.net.au \
    --cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.