From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 15:53:50 +0000 From: Patrick Caulfield Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] New dumb question Message-ID: <20010123155349.F556@tykepenguin.com> References: <3A6D73AB.FC7E1753@infologic.fr> <3A6DA541.E2F7280C@infologic.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3A6DA541.E2F7280C@infologic.fr>; from bs@infologic.fr on Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 04:37:37PM +0100 Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@sistina.com On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 04:37:37PM +0100, Benoit SERRA wrote: > I build it into the kernel with the 2940 driver, reiserfs and the > software raid (I don't like to have critical drivers as modules) > > Stripped LV and NonStripped LVs reported the same bonnie++ result. Is it > normal ? If you're doing striped LVs on top of software RAID I'm not really surprised. Pick one method of striping (LVM *or* RAID) and stick to it but don't mix them or who knows where your data will end up! patrick