From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received:  by oss.sgi.com id <S554115AbRAZVOS>;
	Fri, 26 Jan 2001 13:14:18 -0800
Received: from saturn.mikemac.com ([216.99.199.88]:10504 "EHLO
        saturn.mikemac.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id <S554112AbRAZVOG>;
	Fri, 26 Jan 2001 13:14:06 -0800
Received: from Saturn (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by saturn.mikemac.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA26672;
	Fri, 26 Jan 2001 13:14:03 -0800
Message-Id: <200101262114.NAA26672@saturn.mikemac.com>
To:     Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>
cc:     linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Cross compiling RPMs 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 26 Jan 2001 21:23:41 +0100."
             <20010126212341.A26384@paradigm.rfc822.org> 
Date:   Fri, 26 Jan 2001 13:14:03 -0800
From:   Mike McDonald <mikemac@mikemac.com>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips-outgoing


>Date:   Fri, 26 Jan 2001 21:23:41 +0100
>From: Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>
>To: Pete Popov <ppopov@mvista.com>
>Subject: Re: Cross compiling RPMs

>I definitly go for native builds - 

  If one were to go the native compiling route, what would the minimum
set of rpms needed be? kernel, bin-utils, cc. file-utils? ???

  Mike McDonald
  mikemac@mikemac.com