From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-Id: <200101301446.f0UEkTO10556@denx.local.net> To: Jerry Van Baren cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Initial stack frame From: Wolfgang Denk Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:26:45 EST." <4.3.2.20010130074919.00bb0a80@falcon.si.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:46:29 +0100 Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: In message <4.3.2.20010130074919.00bb0a80@falcon.si.com> Jerry Van Baren wrote: > > One of the differences between the ABI and EABI is that the EABI > requires 8 byte alignment of the stack and the ABI requires 16 byte > alignment (EABI, p.28). Yes, ok. But what is implemented by GCC and glibc? The SVR4 ABI or the EABI? In other words: Wolfgang Grandegger wants to know if we must align "private" stack frames on 8 or 16 byte boundaries... Wolfgang Denk -- Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd@denx.de Visit us at Embedded Systems: Feb 14-16 2001, Nuremberg, Halle 12/K01 (with TQ Components); our presentation "Starke Zwerge: Embedded Linux auf PowerPC-Systemen" on Thursday, Feb 15 2001, 13:30 Forum Halle 11. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/