All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ion Badulescu <ionut@moisil.cs.columbia.edu>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox),
	reiser@namesys.com (Hans Reiser),
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com,
	kas@informatics.muni.cz (Jan Kasprzak)
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink related)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:22:38 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200102022122.f12LMct11509@moisil.dev.hydraweb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cs.lists.linux-kernel/E14OjME-0006nU-00@the-village.bc.nu>

On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 16:46:45 +0000 (GMT), Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>> : 	It is the original one. I'll try with the -69:
>> : 
>> 	With 2.96-69 the reiserfs seems to work well.
>> Sorry for the confusion, I forgot to upgrade the gcc on my machine.
> 
> Excellent. Im just glad to know its a fixed bug.

Yes. But since Red Hat took upon themselves to define "gcc 2.96", they
should have created a new patchlevel (2.96.1) for their fixed compiler.

As it stands, there is no way to determine programatically whether
gcc-2.96 is broken or now. The only way to do it is to check the RPM
version -- which, needless to say, is a bit difficult to do from the
C code about to be compiled. So I can't really blame Hans if he decides
to outlaw gcc-2.96[.0] for reiserfs compiles.

Ion

-- 
  It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool,
            than to open it and remove all doubt.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

       reply	other threads:[~2001-02-02 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cs.lists.linux-kernel/E14OjME-0006nU-00@the-village.bc.nu>
2001-02-02 21:22 ` Ion Badulescu [this message]
2001-02-02 21:57   ` [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink related) Alan Cox
2001-02-02 22:06     ` Arthur Erhardt
2001-02-02 22:06     ` Hans Reiser
2001-02-02 22:57       ` Ion Badulescu
2001-02-05  2:50       ` Brian Wolfe
2001-02-05  4:08         ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-02-05 11:58           ` Alan Cox
2001-02-05 11:36             ` Hans Reiser
2001-02-05 12:44               ` [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink Alan Cox
2001-02-05 12:16                 ` Hans Reiser
2001-02-05 12:52                   ` Alan Cox
2001-02-05 12:33                     ` Hans Reiser
2001-02-05 12:57                   ` Dr. David Gilbert
2001-02-05 16:57               ` [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink related) James Sutherland
2001-02-12  3:41               ` [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink Albert D. Cahalan
2001-02-12  9:45                 ` Hans Reiser
2001-02-05 12:16             ` [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink related) Dr. David Gilbert
2001-02-05  5:21         ` Gregory Maxwell
2001-02-05 12:02           ` Alan Cox
2001-02-05 11:38             ` Hans Reiser
2001-02-05 11:55         ` Alan Cox
2001-02-05 11:35           ` Hans Reiser
2001-02-05 20:19           ` Brian Wolfe
2001-02-02 22:42     ` Ion Badulescu
2001-02-03  3:43       ` Johan Kullstam
2001-02-03  8:57     ` [reiserfs-list] " David Ford
2001-02-03 10:00       ` J . A . Magallon
2001-02-03 23:26         ` Felix von Leitner
2001-02-04 11:04           ` Alan Cox
2001-02-04  3:24       ` John Alvord
2001-02-02 11:28 Jan Kasprzak
2001-02-02 11:04 ` [reiserfs-list] " Hans Reiser
2001-02-02 12:16   ` Jan Kasprzak
2001-02-02 12:34     ` Alan Cox
2001-02-02 13:09       ` Jan Kasprzak
2001-02-02 16:36         ` Jan Kasprzak
2001-02-02 16:46           ` Alan Cox
2001-02-02 12:15 ` John Morrison

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200102022122.f12LMct11509@moisil.dev.hydraweb.com \
    --to=ionut@moisil.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=kas@informatics.muni.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=reiser@namesys.com \
    --cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.