From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 09:37:00 +0000 From: Patrick Caulfield Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvm buglet in 0.9.1_beta Message-ID: <20010206093700.A528@tykepenguin.com> References: <200102051822.f15IMHW01674@case.toyota.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200102051822.f15IMHW01674@case.toyota.com>; from root@case.toyota.com on Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 10:22:17AM -0800 Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@sistina.com On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 10:22:17AM -0800, root wrote: > Hi All, > > I am seeing a buglet with recent lvm (0.9.1_betax) and Compaq "smart" > controllers. The lvm is functional, but the reporting is buggy; > specifically, lvmdiskscan reports that no valid disks/partitions are > found, despite the fact that there are functional logical volumes. It probably just needs COMPAQ_SMART2_MAJOR (& COMPAQ_SMART_MAJOR[1-7]) adding into the list in lvm_check_partitioned_dev.c. It's already in lvm_check_dev.c so I suspect it's just an oversight. Can you try this and let me know if it fixes it please ? patrick