From: Patrick Caulfield <caulfield@sistina.com>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvm buglet in 0.9.1_beta
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 08:46:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010209084651.A528@tykepenguin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200102081838.f18Icgf11614@webber.adilger.net>; from adilger@turbolinux.com on Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 11:38:42AM -0700
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 11:38:42AM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Patrick, you write:
> > On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 11:15:55AM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > > Sure you can run fdisk on just about anything, but you can't access the
> > > partitions unless it is a partitioned device (i.e. the minor numbers
> > > mean "look at a partition").
> >
> > I wasn't being entirely serious here, but the original bug report had
> > a /proc/partitions file showing several minors attached to major 72 so
> > it seemed reasonable to me that it was partitioned.
>
> There is a problem, IMHO, that LVM assumes a partitioned device is the
> same thing as a DOS partitioned device. I'm sure that anyone using
> BSD/Sun/SGI/etc disklabels can not use LVM for this reason. The only
> reason LVM does this is to check the partition type (not very important
> IMO), otherwise we could just check /proc/partitions and be done, like
> the #ifdef __alpha__ code.
It does work with SUN & SGI disklabels since beta3. I've been testing that.
patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-09 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-05 18:22 [linux-lvm] lvm buglet in 0.9.1_beta root
2001-02-06 9:37 ` Patrick Caulfield
2001-02-07 8:45 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-02-07 13:45 ` Patrick Caulfield
2001-02-07 18:15 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-02-08 9:14 ` Patrick Caulfield
2001-02-08 18:38 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-02-09 8:46 ` Patrick Caulfield [this message]
2001-02-12 11:41 ` [linux-lvm] lv nodes in /dev ?? Mr. Penguin
2001-02-12 11:43 ` Mr. Penguin
2001-02-12 16:01 ` Patrick Caulfield
2001-02-12 19:55 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-02-13 10:51 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-02-13 10:59 ` Mr. Penguin
2001-02-12 16:12 ` Patrick Caulfield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010209084651.A528@tykepenguin.com \
--to=caulfield@sistina.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.