From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 19:07:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 19:07:42 -0500 Received: from jalon.able.es ([212.97.163.2]:46054 "EHLO jalon.able.es") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 19:07:34 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 01:07:26 +0100 From: "J . A . Magallon" To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c 2.5.5 Message-ID: <20010215010726.G21100@werewolf.able.es> In-Reply-To: <20010215003802.A21100@werewolf.able.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 00:43:36 +0100 X-Mailer: Balsa 1.1.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02.15 Alan Cox wrote: > > The rest are revision noise and incorrect reverts of include changes > > > #ifndef MODULE > > +#ifdef CONFIG_I2C_CHARDEV > > extern int i2c_dev_init(void); > > Also reverting a cleanup > And I manually deleted the #endif /* X */ (kernel) vs #endif X (i2c 2.5.5) diffs that I got... (do not know why the maintainer did not clone the change...) So I suppose the lm_sensors-2.5.5 package will have the same problems. Well, I will leave it for home use... -- J.A. Magallon $> cd pub mailto:jamagallon@able.es $> more beer Linux werewolf 2.4.1-ac10 #1 SMP Sun Feb 11 23:36:46 CET 2001 i686