From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 08:59:59 +0000 From: Patrick Caulfield Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] snapshot of Reiserfs Message-ID: <20010221085959.C568@tykepenguin.com> References: <20010220224907.D21281@srv.sistina.com> <14995.16871.694699.166774@nv.winux.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <14995.16871.694699.166774@nv.winux.com>; from lvm@winux.com on Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 11:19:51PM -0500 Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@sistina.com On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 11:19:51PM -0500, lvm@winux.com wrote: > Heinz J. Mauelshagen writes: > > ... Linux Logical Volume Manager 0.9.1 Beta 5 is available now ... > > ... > > Please help us to stabilize for 0.9.1 ASAP and test is as much as possible! > > I am using LVM 0.9.1 beta 5 on Linux 2.4.1 with Reiserfs. > I have applied both of the following patches: > > 0.9.1_beta5/PATCHES/lvm-0.9.1_beta5-2.4.1.patch > 0.9.1_beta5/PATCHES/linux-2.4.1-VFS-lock.patch > > Snapshots created when the filesystem is active cannot be mounted. > If I `umount' the filesystem before creating the snapshot, all is well. Did you remember to uncomment LVM_VFS_ENHANCEMENT in lvm.c ? patrick