All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cort Dougan <cort@fsmlabs.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Subject: Re: Question about IRQ_PENDING/IRQ_REPLAY
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 23:07:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010304230707.L2565@ftsoj.fsmlabs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010303144856.A18389@ftsoj.fsmlabs.com> <19350127143809.22288@smtp.wanadoo.fr>
In-Reply-To: <19350127143809.22288@smtp.wanadoo.fr>; from benh@kernel.crashing.org on Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 10:06:25PM +0100

} Also, we currently don't use the same mecanism as i386, and since Linus
} expressed his desire to have irq.c become generic, I'm trying to make sure
} I fully understand it before merging in PPC the bits that I didn't merge
} them yet.

More generic in terms of using irq_desc[] and some similar structures I can
see.  Making do_IRQ() and enable/disable use the same names and structures
as x86 isn't sensible.  They're different ports, with different design
philosophies.

I don't believe that the plan is a common irq.c - lets stay away from that.

  reply	other threads:[~2001-03-05  6:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-03-03  7:20 Question about IRQ_PENDING/IRQ_REPLAY Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-03-03 18:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-03-03 21:48   ` Cort Dougan
2001-03-04 21:06     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-03-05  6:07       ` Cort Dougan [this message]
2001-03-05  9:48         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-03-05 10:00           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-03-05 18:15         ` Linus Torvalds
2001-03-05 21:00           ` Cort Dougan
2001-03-05 21:47             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-03-05 21:39           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-03-04 12:36   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010304230707.L2565@ftsoj.fsmlabs.com \
    --to=cort@fsmlabs.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.