From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <owner-parisc-linux@dsl2.external.hp.com>
Received: from www.linux.org.uk (parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk [195.92.249.252])
	by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A1C64A19
	for <parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org>; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 05:50:40 -0700 (MST)
Received: from willy by www.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 3.13 #1)
	id 14c5IV-0005Wv-00; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 12:50:07 +0000
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 12:50:07 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Alan Modra <alan@linuxcare.com.au>
Cc: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>,
	Matt Taggart <taggart@fc.hp.com>, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] segfaults with new binutils
Message-ID: <20010311125007.A21169@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103111254230.23407-100000@front.linuxcare.com.au> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103111420410.23407-100000@front.linuxcare.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103111420410.23407-100000@front.linuxcare.com.au>; from alan@linuxcare.com.au on Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 02:31:26PM +1100
Sender: <willy@www.linux.org.uk>
List-ID: <linux-parisc.vger.kernel.org>

On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 02:31:26PM +1100, Alan Modra wrote:
> Incidentally, I'm not actively updating binutils CVS on pehc any longer.
> If you want the latest code, get it from sourceware.cygnus.com CVS, either
> the 2.11 branch, or trunk for bleeding edge code.  At the moment, there's
> no particular reason to not use pehc for hppa-linux binutils, as it's not
> too far behind, but that will no doubt change in the future...

Is there any point in keeping this CVS module then?  Shall we just delete it?

-- 
Revolutions do not require corporate support.